Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22731865›Full record

ArticleJournal of natural products2012

Case study of empirical and computational chemical shift analyses: reassignment of the relative configuration of phomopsichalasin to that of diaporthichalasin.

Susan G Brown, Matthew J Jansma, Thomas R Hoye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of natural products, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving the accuracy ofBeilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2023
    Article
  2. Progress in the Chemistry of Cytochalasans.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structure reassignment of laurefurenynes A and B by computation and total synthesis.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan G BrownDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota , 207 Pleasant Street, SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Matthew J Jansma
Thomas R Hoye

Funding

Synthesis Strategies for Bioactive Natural ProductsR01GM065597 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HOYE, THOMAS R. · 2002 to 2016
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-65597NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phomopsichalasin was isolated and assigned structure 1 over 15 years ago. Analysis of its proton NMR data led us to hypothesize that not all aspects of the relative configuration of this structure were correct. We have used both empirical and computational methods to propose an alternative structure. Diaporthichalasin was reported several years ago, and its structure was assigned as 7, a diastereomer of structure 1, and confirmed by a single-crystal X-ray study. We have shown that diaporthichalasin and phomopsichalasin are identical; that is, both have structure 7. Additional aspects of NMR interpretation that provide guidance for avoiding some of the pitfalls that can lead to incorrect structure assignments are discussed. These recommendations/reminders include (i) the use of complementary solvents for acquiring NMR data that break accidental chemical shift degeneracy, (ii) the importance of assigning coupling constants as extensively as possible, and (iii) exercising caution when interpreting correlations in 2D spectra where overlapping resonances are involved.

Indexed as

AscomycotaCytochalasinsMolecular StructureNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularCytochalasinsdiaporthichalasinphomopsichalasin

Identifiers

PMID22731865
PMCPMC3428957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.