Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22731747›Full record

Trial reportBMC veterinary research2012

Effects of lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316 on pig growth and pork quality.

Cheng Suo, Yeshi Yin, Xiaona Wang, Xiuyu Lou, Dafeng Song, Xin Wang, Qing Gu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC veterinary research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dietary Triple-StrainMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dietary supplementation withMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Effect of Oral Administration withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Dietary Supplementation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  18. Effects of Heat-KilledVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Effects of supplementation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng SuoDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Food Science and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yeshi Yin
Xiaona Wang
Xiuyu Lou
Dafeng Song
Xin Wang
Qing Gu
Zhejiang Gongshang University · CNInstitute of Plant Protection · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactobacillus plantarum is a plant-associated bacterial species but it has also been found in human, mouse and porcine gastrointestinal tracts. It can ferment a broad spectrum of plant carbohydrates; it is tolerant of bile salts and low pH, and it has antagonistic potential against intestinal pathogens. However, experiments reporting the use of L. plantarum as a probiotic are limited. In this study, the effects of L. plantarum ZJ316 isolated from infant fecal samples on pig growth and pork quality were investigated.

resultsOne hundred and fifty newly weaned pigs were selected randomly and divided into five groups. Group 1 was fed a diet supplemented with the antibiotic mequindox; Groups 2, 3 and 4 were fed a diet supplemented with L. plantarum and no antibiotic; and Group 5 was fed a mixture of mequindox and L. plantarum. After a 60 days initial treatment, samples were collected for evaluation. The results showed that, the L. plantarum ZJ316 has probiotic effects on pig growth and that these effects are dose dependent. The effects of a dose of 1 × 109 CFU/d were more pronounced than those of a dose of 5 × 109 CFU/d or 1 × 1010 CFU/d. In Group 2 (1 × 109 CFU/d), the diarrhea (p = 0.000) and mortality rates (p = 0.448) were lower than in antibiotic-treated pigs (Group 1), and the daily weight gain (p = 0.001) and food conversion ratios were better (p = 0.005). Improved pork quality was associated with Lactobacillus treatment. pH (45 min, p = 0.020), hardness (p = 0.000), stickiness (p = 0.044), chewiness (p = 0.000), gumminess (p = 0.000) and restoring force (p = 0.004) were all significantly improved in Lactobacillus-treated pigs (Group 2). Although we found that L. plantarum exerted probiotic effects on pig growth and pork quality, the mechanisms underlying its action require further study. Polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis results showed that the gut bacterial communities in Lactobacillus- and antibiotic-treated pigs were very similar and the quantity of L. plantarum ZJ316 was below the detection limits of DGGE-band sequencing. The concentration of short-chain fatty acids in Lactobacillus- and antibiotic-treated fecal samples were not significantly different (p = 0.086). However, the villus height of ilea (p = 0.003), jejuna (p = 0.000) and duodena (p = 0.036) were found to be significantly improved by Lactobacillus treatment.

conclusionL. plantarum ZJ316 was found to have probiotic effects, improving pig growth and pork quality. The probiotic mechanism might not involve L. plantarum colonization and alteration of the gut bacterial community. Rather, it might be related to the inhibition of the growth of opportunistic pathogens and promotion of increased villus height.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsIntestine, SmallLactiplantibacillus plantarumMeatPhylogenyProbioticsQuinoxalinesSwineMequindoxQuinoxalines

Identifiers

PMID22731747
PMCPMC3482153
OpenAlexW2130063225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.