ArticleGenome research2012
Transcription factor redundancy and tissue-specific regulation: evidence from functional and physical network connectivity.
Article in Genome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcription factor targeting strategies in cancer: mechanisms, challenges and cutting-edge progress.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Isoform-specific functions of PPARγ in gene regulation and metabolism.Genes & development · 2022Article
- HLH-1 Modulates Muscle Proteostasis DuringFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- SAResNet: self-attention residual network for predicting DNA-protein binding.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- FHOD formin and SRF promote post-embryonic striated muscle growth through separate pathways in C. elegans.Experimental cell research · 2021Article
- Plant PHR Transcription Factors: Put on A Map.Genes · 2019Review
- UNC-120/SRF independently controls muscle aging and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans.Aging cell · 2018Article
- A network diffusion approach to inferring sample-specific function reveals functional changes associated with breast cancer.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- A Differentiation Transcription Factor Establishes Muscle-Specific Proteostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Overlapping cell population expression profiling and regulatory inference in C. elegans.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Collaborative regulation of development but independent control of metabolism by two epidermis-specific transcription factors in Caenorhabditis elegans.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Integrative analysis of C. elegans modENCODE ChIP-seq data sets to infer gene regulatory interactions.Genome research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Two major transcriptional regulators of Caenorhabditis elegans bodywall muscle (BWM) differentiation, hlh-1 and unc-120, are expressed in muscle where they are known to bind and regulate several well-studied muscle-specific genes. Simultaneously mutating both factors profoundly inhibits formation of contractile BWM. These observations were consistent with a simple network model in which the muscle regulatory factors drive tissue-specific transcription by binding selectively near muscle-specific targets to activate them. We tested this model by measuring the number, identity, and tissue-specificity of functional regulatory targets for each factor. Some joint regulatory targets (218) are BWM-specific and enriched for nearby HLH-1 binding. However, contrary to the simple model, the majority of genes regulated by one or both muscle factors are also expressed significantly in non-BWM tissues. We also mapped global factor occupancy by HLH-1, and created a genetic interaction map that identifies hlh-1 collaborating transcription factors. HLH-1 binding did not predict proximate regulatory action overall, despite enrichment for binding among BWM-specific positive regulatory targets of hlh-1. We conclude that these tissue-specific factors contribute much more broadly to the transcriptional output of muscle tissue than previously thought, offering a partial explanation for widespread HLH-1 occupancy. We also identify a novel regulatory connection between the BWM-specific hlh-1 network and the hlh-8/twist nonstriated muscle network. Finally, our results suggest a molecular basis for synthetic lethality in which hlh-1 and unc-120 mutant phenotypes are mutually buffered by joint additive regulation of essential target genes, with additional buffering suggested via newly identified hlh-1 interacting factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.