ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2012
Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.
Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of internal (through implantable cardioverter defibrillator) versus external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2020Trial
- Dynamics of cell membrane lesions and adaptive conductance under the electrical stress.Cell stress · 2024Article
- How to alleviate cardiac injury from electric shocks at the cellular level.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- The Defibrillation Conundrum: New Insights into the Mechanisms of Shock-Related Myocardial Injury Sustained from a Life-Saving Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Electroporation safety factor of 300 nanosecond and 10 millisecond defibrillation in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts.PloS one · 2021Article
- Acute pathophysiological myocardial changes following intra-cardiac electrical shocks using a proteomic approach in a sheep model.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Phase Entrainment of Induced Ventricular Fibrillation: A Human Feasibility and Proof of Concept Study.Journal of atrial fibrillation · 2019Article
- Excitation of murine cardiac myocytes by nanosecond pulsed electric field.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2019Article
- Electrical storm: mechanistic and therapeutic considerations to avoid death in the survivors.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Excitation and injury of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes by nano- to millisecond electric shocks.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Prognostic impact of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Mechanistic and therapeutic considerations to reduce the risk of death.International journal of cardiology · 2018Article
- Low-energy defibrillation with nanosecond electric shocks.Cardiovascular research · 2017Article
- Evidence for Acute Myocardial and Skeletal Muscle Injury after Serial Transthoracic Shocks in Healthy Swine.PloS one · 2016Article
- Effect of Twisted Fiber Anisotropy in Cardiac Tissue on Ablation with Pulsed Electric Fields.PloS one · 2016Article
- Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015Article
- Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015Article
- Article
- Optical pacing of the adult rabbit heart.Biomedical optics express · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Defibrillation shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators can be lifesaving but can also damage cardiac tissues via electroporation. This study characterizes the spatial distribution and extent of defibrillation shock-induced electroporation with and without a 45-min postshock period for cell membranes to recover. Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 31) with and without a chronic left ventricular (LV) myocardial infarction (MI) were studied. Mean defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined to be 161.4 ± 17.1 V and 1.65 ± 0.44 J in MI hearts for internally delivered 8-ms monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) shocks during sustained ventricular fibrillation (>20 s, SVF). A single 300-V MTE shock (twice determined DFT voltage) was used to terminate SVF. Shock-induced electroporation was assessed by propidium iodide (PI) uptake. Ventricular PI staining was quantified by fluorescent imaging. Histological analysis was performed using Masson's Trichrome staining. Results showed PI staining concentrated near the shock electrode in all hearts. Without recovery, PI staining was similar between normal and MI groups around the shock electrode and over the whole ventricles. However, MI hearts had greater total PI uptake in anterior (P < 0.01) and posterior (P < 0.01) LV epicardial regions. Postrecovery, PI staining was reduced substantially, but residual staining remained significant with similar spacial distributions. PI staining under SVF was similar to previously studied paced hearts. In conclusion, electroporation was spatially correlated with the active region of the shock electrode. Additional electroporation occurred in the LV epicardium of MI hearts, in the infarct border zone. Recovery of membrane integrity postelectroporation is likely a prolonged process. Short periods of SVF did not affect electroporation injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.