Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22730009›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical immunology2012

Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin versus hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of primary antibody deficiencies: systematic review and meta analysis.

Hassan Abolhassani, Mohammad Salehi Sadaghiani, Asghar Aghamohammadi, Hans D Ochs, Nima Rezaei

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. The International/Canadian hereditary angioedema guideline.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hassan AbolhassaniChildren's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran, 14194, Iran.
Mohammad Salehi Sadaghiani
Asghar Aghamohammadi
Hans D Ochs
Nima Rezaei
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRChildren's Medical Center · IRSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoglobulin replacement by the subcutaneous route (SCIg) for the prophylactic treatment of primary or secondary antibody deficient patients has been introduced as an alternative to conventional intravenous administration (IVIg). This is a systematic review of all eligible studies comparing efficacy and safety of IVIg and SCIg. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies and randomized, controlled trials comparing SCIg to IVIg were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, CSR, ISI and Cochrane Database without restriction on publication date and language. If possible, meta-analysis was performed by using the Review Manager software. A total of 47 articles with 1,484 compared cases were reviewed. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement achieved acceptable IgG trough level, low incidence of side effects, efficacy similar to IVIg infusions, better health related quality of life and treatment satisfaction, and faster functional recovery with less time off work. Because of the heterogeneity of the reports, meta-analysis had to be performed by random effect method for IgG trough levels [OR (odds ratio) = 1.00, range = 0.84-1.15; p < 0.01], infection rates (OR = 0.59, range = 0.36-0.97; p = 0.04), and adverse events (OR = 0.09, range = 0.07-0.11; p < 0.001), which showed significant preference of SCIg over IVIg. Based on the analysis of published reports, changing immunoglobulin replacement therapy from IVIg to SCIg may be of benefit to qualified patients with primary immunodeficiency. These advantages, having been demonstrated in numerous studies,make medical, practical and economic sense to consider switching patients with antibody deficiency from IVIg to SCIg.

Indexed as

Infusions, SubcutaneousDatabases, BibliographicHumansImmunization, PassiveImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSelf AdministrationImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulins, Intravenous

Identifiers

PMID22730009
OpenAlexW2037581442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.