Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22729825›Full record

ArticlePlanta2012

Deciphering the route of Ralstonia solanacearum colonization in Arabidopsis thaliana roots during a compatible interaction: focus at the plant cell wall.

Catherine Digonnet, Yves Martinez, Nicolas Denancé, Marine Chasseray, Patrick Dabos, Philippe Ranocha, Yves Marco, Alain Jauneau, Deborah Goffner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The EPS-I exopolysaccharide transformsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Strategies utilized by plants to defend againstFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Anatomical and Biochemical Changes Induced byFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Protease Activities Triggered byMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine DigonnetUniversité de Toulouse, UPS, UMR 5546, Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, BP 42617, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Yves Martinez
Nicolas Denancé
Marine Chasseray
Patrick Dabos
Philippe Ranocha
Yves Marco
Alain Jauneau
Deborah Goffner
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRLaboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The compatible interaction between the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, and the GMI1000 strain of the phytopathogenic bacterium, Ralstonia solanacearum, was investigated in an in vitro pathosystem. We describe the progression of the bacteria in the root from penetration at the root surface to the xylem vessels and the cell type-specific, cell wall-associated modifications that accompanies bacterial colonization. Within 6 days post inoculation, R. solanacearum provoked a rapid plasmolysis of the epidermal, cortical, and endodermal cells, including those not directly in contact with the bacteria. Plasmolysis was accompanied by a global degradation of pectic homogalacturonanes as shown by the loss of JIM7 and JIM5 antibody signal in the cell wall of these cell types. As indicated by immunolabeling with Rsol-I antibodies that specifically recognize R. solanacearum, the bacteria progresses through the root in a highly directed, centripetal manner to the xylem poles, without extensive multiplication in the intercellular spaces along its path. Entry into the vascular cylinder was facilitated by cell collapse of the two pericycle cells located at the xylem poles. Once the bacteria reached the xylem vessels, they multiplied abundantly and moved from vessel to vessel by digesting the pit membrane between adjacent vessels. The degradation of the secondary walls of xylem vessels was not a prerequisite for vessel colonization as LM10 antibodies strongly labeled xylem cell walls, even at very late stages in disease development. Finally, the capacity of R. solanacearum to specifically degrade certain cell wall components and not others could be correlated with the arsenal of cell wall hydrolytic enzymes identified in the bacterial genome.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsArabidopsisCell WallImmunohistochemistryLipopolysaccharidesPectinsPlant DiseasesPlant EpidermisPlant RootsRalstonia solanacearumSeedlingsXylemLipopolysaccharidesPectinspolygalacturonic acid

Identifiers

PMID22729825
OpenAlexW2059183178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.