Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22729705›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2012

Comparison of long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with suture fixation with and without tacks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Virinder Kumar Bansal, Mahesh C Misra, Divya Babu, Paras Singhal, Keerthi Rao, Rajesh Sagar, Subodh Kumar, S Rajeshwari, Vimi Rewari

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Seroma prevention strategies in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. A comparative study between ETEP vs. IPOM repair for ventral hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Lower recurrence rate with full-thickness mesh fixation in incisional hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Gallbladder perforation by absorbable spiral tacker.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Virinder Kumar BansalDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 5021, 5th Floor Teaching Block, New Delhi, India. drvkbansal@gmail.com
Mahesh C Misra
Divya Babu
Paras Singhal
Keerthi Rao
Rajesh Sagar
Subodh Kumar
S Rajeshwari
Vimi Rewari

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnique of mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a matter of debate. Literature is lacking in randomized trials comparing various methods of mesh fixation. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes following the two methods of mesh fixation.

methodsA total of 110 patients were randomized to tacker mesh fixation or suture mesh fixation. Patients with nonrecurrent hernias with defect size ranging from 2 to 5 cm were included. The cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. SF-36v2 health survey was used for quality-of-life analysis. Patients were followed up at regular intervals, and return to activity and satisfaction scores were recorded.

resultsDemographic profile and hernia characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Operation time was significantly higher (p < 0) and early postoperative pain at 1 h, 6 h, and 1 month was significantly lower in the suture group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic pain and seroma formation over a mean follow-up of 32.2 months. Cost of procedure was significantly higher in group I (p < 0.001). Suture fixation was found to be more cost-effective than tacker fixation. Postoperative quality of life outcomes were similar in the two groups. Among return to activity parameters, time to resumption of daily activities and starting climbing stairs were significantly shorter in the suture group.

conclusionsThe suture fixation method is a cost-effective alternative to tacker fixation in patients with small- to medium-sized defects in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Suture fixation is better than tacker fixation in terms of early postoperative pain and return to activity. The two procedures are equally effective regarding the recurrence rates, complications, hospital stay, chronic pain, quality of life determinants, and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSuture TechniquesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.