ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012
Antimicrobial properties of distinctin in an experimental model of MRSA-infected wounds.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The sources of antimicrobial peptides against Gram-positives and Gramnegatives: our research experience.Le infezioni in medicina · 2023Review
- Our Experience over 20 Years: Antimicrobial Peptides against Gram Positives, Gram Negatives, and Fungi.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- New Perspectives on Old and New Therapies of Staphylococcal Skin Infections: The Role of Biofilm Targeting in Wound Healing.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Efficacy of Cathelicidin LL-37 in an MRSA Wound Infection Mouse Model.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- New Evidence and Insights on Dalbavancin and Wound Healing in a Mouse Model of Skin Infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Role of Daptomycin on Burn Wound Healing in an Animal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection Model.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of distinctin in the management of cutaneous methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) wound infections in an experimental mouse model. Wounds, made in the panniculus carnosus of BALB/c mice, were inoculated with 5 × 10(7) colony-forming units (CFU) of MRSA. Mice were treated with topical distinctin (1 mg/kg of body weight), topical teicoplanin (7 mg/kg of body weight), intraperitoneal teicoplanin (7 mg/kg of body weight); topical teicoplanin and daily intraperitoneal teicoplanin; topical distinctin and daily intraperitoneal teicoplanin. Bacterial cultures of excised tissues and histological examination of microvessel density and of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression were studied. It was found that topical distinctin combined with parenteral teicoplanin inhibited bacterial growth to levels comparable with those observed in uninfected animals. Wounded areas of animals treated with distinctin were characterized by a more mature granulation tissue, with a more organized and denser type of connective tissue, compared to mice treated only with teicoplanin. Treatment with topical distinctin had a significant impact on VEGF expression and microvessel density. The combined use of distinctin with teicoplanin may be useful in the management of infected wounds by significantly inhibiting bacterial growth and accelerating the repair process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.