Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22726843›Full record

ArticleMetabolism: clinical and experimental2012

Hip geometry in diabetic women: implications for fracture risk.

Rajesh Garg, Zhao Chen, Thomas Beck, Jane A Cauley, Guanglin Wu, Dorothy Nelson, Beth Lewis, Andrea LaCroix, Meryl S LeBoff

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Do proximal hip geometry, trabecular microarchitecture, and prevalent vertebral fractures differ in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus? A cross-sectional study from a teaching hospital in southern India.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging of diabetic bone.Endocrine · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Genistein treatment increases bone mass in obese, hyperglycemic mice.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2016
    Article
  16. Sex-specific differences in progressive glucose intolerance and hip geometry: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rajesh GargBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Zhao Chen
Thomas Beck
Jane A Cauley
Guanglin Wu
Dorothy Nelson
Beth Lewis
Andrea LaCroix
Meryl S LeBoff

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNIA NIH HHS HHSN271201100004CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWomen with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a higher risk of fractures despite increased bone mineral density (BMD) as compared to women without diabetes. We hypothesized that bone strength is diminished in women with T2DM after accounting for lean body mass, which may contribute to their increased fracture risk.

methodsParticipants from Women's Health Initiative Observational Study were included in this cross-sectional study. These analyses include 3 groups of women: 1) T2DM women on diet or oral hypoglycemic agents (n=299); 2) T2DM women on insulin therapy (with or without oral agents) (n=128); and 3) Non-diabetic control women (n=5497). Hip structural analyses were done using the validated Beck's method on hip scans from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We compared BMD and section modulus (bending strength) at the narrow neck with and without correcting for total body DXA lean body mass.

resultsWomen in all three groups were of similar ages (63.7, 64.6 and 64.2 years, respectively) and heights, but those with T2DM were heavier, with greater lean body weight vs controls (P<.001). In both diabetic groups, absolute BMD and section modulus were higher compared with controls. However, after adjusting for total lean body weight, diabetic women on insulin had significantly lower BMD and section modulus.

conclusionAdjusted for lean body weight, the BMD and bending strength in the femoral neck are significantly lower in insulin-treated diabetic women vs controls. This may represent altered adaptation of bone modeling and explain the higher fracture risk in patients with T2DM.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedBody CompositionBone RemodelingCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diet, DiabeticFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesFemur NeckHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMiddle AgedPostmenopauseRisk AssessmentHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22726843
PMCPMC3459306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.