ArticleChemistry & biology2012
Cell-free screening for NOX inhibitors.
Article in Chemistry & biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure, Activation, and Regulation of NOX2: At the Crossroad between the Innate Immunity and Oxidative Stress-Mediated Pathologies.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Targeting Oxidative Stress as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2016Review
- Evolution of NADPH Oxidase Inhibitors: Selectivity and Mechanisms for Target Engagement.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NOX enzymes are major ROS generators in pathological states and represent a promising pharmacological target. In this issue of Chemistry & Biology, Smith and colleagues developed an original and elegant cell-free assay to identify specific Nox2 inhibitors in a high throughput manner.
Identifiers
22726678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.