ArticleBMC genomics2012
Losing identity: structural diversity of transposable elements belonging to different classes in the genome of Anopheles gambiae.
Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Satellite DNAs rising from the transposon graveyards.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025Review
- Article
- Chromosomal characterization of three species of Serrasalmini (Serrasalmidae: Characiformes).Genetics and molecular biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Transposable element variants and their potential adaptive impact in urban populations of the malaria vectorGenome research · 2022Article
- Evolutionary insights in Amazonian turtles (Testudines, Podocnemididae): co-location of 5S rDNA and U2 snRNA and wide distribution of Tc1/Mariner.Biology open · 2020Article
- Homology-Free Detection of Transposable Elements Unveils Their Dynamics in Three Ecologically DistinctGenes · 2020Article
- DNA transposon invasion and microsatellite accumulation guide W chromosome differentiation in a Neotropical fish genome.Chromosoma · 2019Article
- Identification of Bari Transposons in 23 Sequenced Drosophila Genomes Reveals Novel Structural Variants, MITEs and Horizontal Transfer.PloS one · 2016Article
- Mariner transposons are sailing in the genome of the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Endogenous siRNAs and piRNAs derived from transposable elements and genes in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Repetitive sequences: the hidden diversity of heterochromatin in prochilodontid fish.Comparative cytogenetics · 2015Article
- Cross-Species Transmission and Differential Fate of an Endogenous Retrovirus in Three Mammal Lineages.PLoS pathogens · 2015Article
- Genome-wide characterization of endogenous retroviruses in the bat Myotis lucifugus reveals recent and diverse infections.Journal of virology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTransposable elements (TEs), both DNA transposons and retrotransposons, are genetic elements with the main characteristic of being able to mobilize and amplify their own representation within genomes, utilizing different mechanisms of transposition. An almost universal feature of TEs in eukaryotic genomes is their inability to transpose by themselves, mainly as the result of sequence degeneration (by either mutations or deletions). Most of the elements are thus either inactive or non-autonomous. Considering that the bulk of some eukaryotic genomes derive from TEs, they have been conceived as "TE graveyards." It has been shown that once an element has been inactivated, it progressively accumulates mutations and deletions at neutral rates until completely losing its identity or being lost from the host genome; however, it has also been shown that these "neutral sequences" might serve as raw material for domestication by host genomes.
resultsWe have analyzed the sequence structural variations, nucleotide divergence, and pattern of insertions and deletions of several superfamilies of TEs belonging to both class I (long terminal repeats [LTRs] and non-LTRs [NLTRs]) and II in the genome of Anopheles gambiae, aiming at describing the landscape of deterioration of these elements in this particular genome. Our results describe a great diversity in patterns of deterioration, indicating lineage-specific differences including the presence of Solo-LTRs in the LTR lineage, 5'-deleted NLTRs, and several non-autonomous and MITEs in the class II families. Interestingly, we found fragments of NLTRs corresponding to the RT domain, which preserves high identity among them, suggesting a possible remaining genomic role for these domains.
conclusionsWe show here that the TEs in the An. gambiae genome deteriorate in different ways according to the class to which they belong. This diversity certainly has implications not only at the host genomic level but also at the amplification dynamic and evolution of the TE families themselves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.