Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22725849›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2012

Effect of medicare part D benzodiazepine exclusion on psychotropic use in benzodiazepine users.

Michael K Ong, Haiyong Xu, Lily Zhang, Francisca Azocar, Susan L Ettner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Trends and variation in benzodiazepine use in nursing homes in the USA.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael K OngDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA. michael.ong@ucla.edu
Haiyong Xu
Lily Zhang
Francisca Azocar
Susan L Ettner
University of California, Los Angeles · USLos Angeles County Department of Health Services · USOral Health Solutions (United States) · US

Funding

The Role of Social Networks in Treatment Engagement for MinoritiesP30MH082760 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BELIN, THOMAS · 2008 to 2012
$8.6M
RESEARCH NETWORK DEVELOPMENT CORE (PAGE 472)P30MH068639 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2003 to 2007
$8.0M
Impact of the Medicare Part D Benzodiazepine Exclusion on Managed Care PatientsR01MH079034 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ETTNER, SUSAN LOUISE · 2007 to 2008
$488k
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH068639NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH082760NIMH NIH HHS P30MH082760NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079034NIMH NIH HHS R01MH079034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effect of the Medicare benzodiazepine coverage exclusion on psychotropic use of benzodiazepine users.

designPre-post design with concurrent control group.

settingGeneral community.

participantsIntervention and comparison cohorts of individuals drawn from the same insurer who were prescribed benzodiazepines through the end of 2005. Intervention participants (n = 19,339) were elderly adults from a large, national Medicare Advantage plan subject to benzodiazepine exclusion as a result of the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA). Comparison participants (n = 3,488) were near-elderly individuals enrolled in a managed care plan not subject to the MMA benzodiazepine exclusion. MEASUREMENTS: Any psychotropic drug use and expenditures.

resultsIn the intervention cohort, benzodiazepine use and expenditures significantly declined from 100% and $134 in 2005 to 74.8% and $59, respectively, in 2007. Nonbenzodiazepine psychotropic drug use and expenditures significantly increased from 35.8% and $163 in 2005 to 39.5% and $207, respectively, in 2007. In the comparison cohort, benzodiazepine use and expenditures also significantly declined from 100% and $173 in 2005 to 57.5% and $105, respectively, in 2007, but nonbenzodiazepine psychotropic drug use and expenditures significantly declined from 55.4% and $647 in 2005 to 45.1% and $572, respectively, in 2007. Changes in antidepressant and anxiolytic use were the primary cause of changes in nonbenzodiazepine psychotropic drugs in both cohorts.

conclusionUse of benzodiazepines continued in elderly adults despite negative financial incentives, possibly because of the low costs of such medications. Although some substitution occurred with antidepressants and anxiolytics, the magnitude of this increase did not fully offset the reduction in benzodiazepine use.

Indexed as

Medicare Part DAgedAged, 80 and overBenzodiazepinesComorbidityFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePsychotropic DrugsUnited StatesBenzodiazepinesPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID22725849
PMCPMC4387568
OpenAlexW2031865939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.