Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22724058›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2012

Substitutional reality system: a novel experimental platform for experiencing alternative reality.

Keisuke Suzuki, Sohei Wakisaka, Naotaka Fujii

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Consciousness and the invention of Morel.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Awareness as observational heterarchy.Frontiers in psychology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keisuke SuzukiLaboratory for Adaptive Intelligence, Brain Science Institute , RIKEN 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
Sohei Wakisaka
Naotaka Fujii

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a novel experimental platform, referred to as a substitutional reality (SR) system, for studying the conviction of the perception of live reality and related metacognitive functions. The SR system was designed to manipulate people's reality by allowing them to experience live scenes (in which they were physically present) and recorded scenes (which were recorded and edited in advance) in an alternating manner without noticing a reality gap. All of the naïve participants (n = 21) successfully believed that they had experienced live scenes when recorded scenes had been presented. Additional psychophysical experiments suggest the depth of visual objects does not affect the perceptual discriminability between scenes, and the scene switch during head movement enhance substitutional performance. The SR system, with its reality manipulation, is a novel and affordable method for studying metacognitive functions and psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHead MovementsHumansMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformancePsychophysicsSensationSensory ThresholdsSpace PerceptionUser-Computer InterfaceVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID22724058
PMCPMC3380296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.