SynthesisPloS one2012
The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: a systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effects of social media abstinence on affective well-being and life satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- White Spots: Prevention in Orthodontics-Systematic Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Workplace coaching: a meta-analysis and recommendations for advancing theFrontiers in psychology · 2023Pooled it
- Questionnaire and behavioral task measures of impulsivity are differentially associated with body mass index: A comprehensive meta-analysis.Psychological bulletin · 2017Pooled it
- Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2014Pooled it
- Peer education intervention reduced sexually transmitted infections among male Tajik labor migrants who inject drugs: results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2025Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of Goal Management Training for executive functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders or psychosis risk syndromes.BMC psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Optimising Extinction of Conditioned Disgust.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Can obtaining informed consent alter self-reported drinking behaviour? A methodological experiment.BMC medical research methodology · 2015Trial
- Effects of study design and allocation on self-reported alcohol consumption: randomized trial.Trials · 2015Trial
- Patient preferences and performance bias in a weight loss trial with a usual care arm.Patient education and counseling · 2014Trial
- Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design.BMC medical research methodology · 2013Trial
- Addressing demand artifacts in psychological research (and beyond).Behavior research methods · 2026Review
- Hyperactive-impulsive ADHD traits predict higher curiosity in adults: evidence from a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Screening for Anxiety and Intimate Partner Violence.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Non-immersive robot teleoperation does not reliably affect egocentric dishonesty but can influence altruistic dishonesty.iScience · 2026Article
- Where is the self? Relations between head-heart dualism and social judgment.Consciousness and cognition · 2026Article
- Politeness cannot make up for robots' errors.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of demand characteristics, which involves research participants being aware of what the researcher is investigating, is well known and widely used within psychology, particularly in laboratory-based studies. Studies of this phenomenon may make a useful contribution to broader consideration of the effects of taking part in research on participant behaviour. This systematic review seeks to summarise data from studies of the effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsElectronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. These had to be purposely designed to evaluate possible effects of demand characteristics on at least one behavioural outcome under the autonomous control of the participants and use longitudinal study designs. Only 7 studies were included, 6 providing observational data and 1 experimental study, with 5 studies involving examination of possible effects on health behaviours. Although studies provided some evidence of effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviour, heterogeneous operationalisation of the construct, the limited number of studies and poor quality of study designs made synthesis and interpretation of study findings challenging. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although widely accepted as important in psychology, there have been few dedicated studies of the effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours outside laboratory settings. This body of literature does not currently contribute to the wider study of research participation effects. A systematic review of data from laboratory-based studies is needed, as are high-quality primary studies in non-laboratory settings. We suggest that unqualified use of the term demand characteristics should be abandoned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.