ArticlePloS one2012
Profound effect of profiling platform and normalization strategy on detection of differentially expressed microRNAs--a comparative study.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- MicroRNAs associated with exercise and diet: a systematic review.Physiological genomics · 2015Pooled it
- MicroRNA profiling in plasma samples using qPCR arrays: Recommendations for correct analysis and interpretation.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Kidney diseases and single-cell sequencing research: a bibliometric analysis from 2015 to 2024.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Fetal sex modulates placental microRNA expression, potential microRNA-mRNA interactions, and levels of amino acid transporter expression and substrates: INFAT study subpopulation analysis of n-3 LCPUFA intervention during pregnancy and associations with offspring body composition.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2021Article
- Methodological considerations for measuring biofluid-based microRNA biomarkers.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2021Article
- High-throughput microRNA profile in adult and pediatric primary glioblastomas: the role of miR-10b-5p and miR-630 in the tumor aggressiveness.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- New surveillance concepts in food safety in meat producing animals: the advantage of high throughput 'omics' technologies - A review.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2018Article
- Article
- Methods and novel technology for microRNA quantification in colorectal cancer screening.Clinical epigenetics · 2017Review
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Differentiation and Three-Dimensional Tissue Formation Attenuate Clonal Epigenetic Differences in Trichohyalin.Stem cells and development · 2016Article
- Toward reliable biomarker signatures in the age of liquid biopsies - how to standardize the small RNA-Seq workflow.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Simple regression for correcting ΔCt bias in RT-qPCR low-density array data normalization.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- microRNA-based diagnostics and therapy in cardiovascular disease-Summing up the facts.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2015Review
- TNF-α and IGF1 modify the microRNA signature in skeletal muscle cell differentiation.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2015Article
- miRNA-197 and miRNA-223 Predict Cardiovascular Death in a Cohort of Patients with Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease.PloS one · 2015Article
- Article
- Circulating micrornas associated with glycemic impairment and progression in Asian Indians.Biomarker research · 2015Article
- MicroRNA and hepatitis C virus--challenges in investigation and translation: a review of the literature.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2014Review
- Noninvasive micromarkers.Clinical chemistry · 2014Review
- Evaluation of quantitative miRNA expression platforms in the microRNA quality control (miRQC) study.Nature methods · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdequate normalization minimizes the effects of systematic technical variations and is a prerequisite for getting meaningful biological changes. However, there is inconsistency about miRNA normalization performances and recommendations. Thus, we investigated the impact of seven different normalization methods (reference gene index, global geometric mean, quantile, invariant selection, loess, loessM, and generalized procrustes analysis) on intra- and inter-platform performance of two distinct and commonly used miRNA profiling platforms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe included data from miRNA profiling analyses derived from a hybridization-based platform (Agilent Technologies) and an RT-qPCR platform (Applied Biosystems). Furthermore, we validated a subset of miRNAs by individual RT-qPCR assays. Our analyses incorporated data from the effect of differentiation and tumor necrosis factor alpha treatment on primary human skeletal muscle cells and a murine skeletal muscle cell line. Distinct normalization methods differed in their impact on (i) standard deviations, (ii) the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, (iii) the similarity of differential expression. Loess, loessM, and quantile analysis were most effective in minimizing standard deviations on the Agilent and TLDA platform. Moreover, loess, loessM, invariant selection and generalized procrustes analysis increased the area under the ROC curve, a measure for the statistical performance of a test. The Jaccard index revealed that inter-platform concordance of differential expression tended to be increased by loess, loessM, quantile, and GPA normalization of AGL and TLDA data as well as RGI normalization of TLDA data. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We recommend the application of loess, or loessM, and GPA normalization for miRNA Agilent arrays and qPCR cards as these normalization approaches showed to (i) effectively reduce standard deviations, (ii) increase sensitivity and accuracy of differential miRNA expression detection as well as (iii) increase inter-platform concordance. Results showed the successful adoption of loessM and generalized procrustes analysis to one-color miRNA profiling experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.