ArticleMaterials Research Society symposia proceedings. Materials Research Society2011
Quantifying Micro-mechanical Properties of Soft Biological Tissues with Scanning Acoustic Microscopy.
Article in Materials Research Society symposia proceedings. Materials Research Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Paradigm for Tissue Diagnostics: Tools and Techniques to Standardize Tissue Collection, Transport, and Fixation.Current pathobiology reports · 2018Review
- Material Properties of Human Ocular Tissue at 7-µm Resolution.Ultrasonic imaging · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study we have established a new approach to more accurately map acoustic wave speed (which is a measure of stiffness) within soft biological tissues at micrometer length scales using scanning acoustic microscopy. By using thin (5 μm thick) histological sections of human skin and porcine cartilage, this method exploits the phase information preserved in the interference between acoustic waves reflected from the substrate surface as well as internal reflections from the acoustic lens. A stack of images were taken with the focus point of acoustic lens positioned at or above the substrate surface, and processed pixel by pixel using custom software developed with LABVIEW and IMAQ (National Instruments) to extract phase information. Scanning parameters, such as acoustic wave frequency and gate position were optimized to get reasonable phase and lateral resolution. The contribution from substrate inclination or uneven scanning surface was removed prior to further processing. The wave attenuation was also obtained from these images.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.