Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22723221›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2012

Assessing cell and organ senescence biomarkers.

Bruno Bernardes de Jesus, Maria A Blasco

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Chronic Kidney Disease and Cellular Senescence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Renal Cell Senescence in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Advances.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bruno Bernardes de JesusTelomeres and Telomerase Group, Molecular Oncology Program, Spanish National Cancer Centre, Madrid, Spain.
Maria A Blasco
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre · ES

Funding

European Research Council 232854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal in cancer and aging research is to discriminate the biochemical modifications that happen locally that could account for the healthiness or malignancy of tissues. Senescence is one general antiproliferative cellular process that acts as a strong barrier for cancer progression, playing a crucial role in aging. Here, we focus on the current methods to assess cellular senescence, discriminating the advantages and disadvantages of several senescence biomarkers.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAgingAnimalsBiomarkersGenetic MarkersGenotypeHumansOncogenesPhenotypeTelomereTelomere ShorteningBiomarkersGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID22723221
PMCPMC4824275
OpenAlexW2097942030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.