Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22722991›Full record

SynthesisMolecular biology reports2012

NAT2 polymorphisms with oral carcinoma susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Xian-Lu Zhuo, Jun-Jun Ling, Yan Zhou, Hou-Yu Zhao, Yu-Feng Song, Ying-Hui Tan

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. N-acetyltransferase 2 genetic variants confer the susceptibility to head and neck carcinoma: evidence from 23 case-control studies.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xian-Lu ZhuoDepartment of Stomatology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jun-Jun Ling
Yan Zhou
Hou-Yu Zhao
Yu-Feng Song
Ying-Hui Tan
Nanyang Medical College · CNXinqiao Hospital · CNArmy Medical University · CNSouthwest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Published data have implicated NAT2 polymorphisms as risk factors for various cancers. A number of studies have focused on the association of NAT2 polymorphisms with susceptibility to oral carcinoma and have yielded inconclusive results. The aim of the present study was to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. We first carried out a deliberate search in the databases without a language limitation, covering all papers published up to Dec 2011. A total of seven case-control studies including 1,379 cases and 1,868 controls were selected and the relevant data were extracted for systematic meta-analyses. No significant association was found for the overall data (OR: 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.79-1.39). In subgroup analyses according to ethnicity, slow acetylators might increase oral cancer risk among Asians (OR: 1.38, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.82) but not Caucasians or Mixed races. The data suggested that NAT2 polymorphisms might be a low-penetrant risk factor for oral carcinoma in Asians.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideArylamine N-AcetyltransferaseCarcinomaCase-Control StudiesHumansMouth NeoplasmsPublication BiasArylamine N-AcetyltransferaseNAT2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22722991
OpenAlexW1968757148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.