ArticleRoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin2012
Introduction of a new standardized assessment score of spine morphology in osteogenesis imperfecta.
Article in RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of denosumab in children with osteogenesis imperfect--a first prospective trial.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2016Trial
- Reporting of paediatric osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and potential impact on clinical management: the need for standardised and structured reporting.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Imaging of pediatric bone and growth disorders: Of diagnostic workhorses and new horizons.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2021Article
- Bone morbidity in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2020Article
- Individualized treatment with denosumab in children with osteogenesis imperfecta - follow up of a trial cohort.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019Article
- Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in children.Pediatric radiology · 2019Review
- Diagnosis of vertebral fractures in children: is a simplified algorithm-based qualitative technique reliable?Pediatric radiology · 2016Article
- Osteogenesis imperfecta: pathophysiology and treatment.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2015Review
- Two years' experience with denosumab for children with osteogenesis imperfecta type VI.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOsteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare hereditary disease leading to multiple bone deformities and fractures. In the absence of causal therapy, a symptomatic approach is based on treatment with bisphosphonates and physiotherapy. The clinical and radiological manifestations vary. Therefore, standardization and quantification for an objective comparison, especially during therapy, are required. In this paper, radiological changes of the spine are quantified according to their clinical relevance to define a scoring system that transfers the morphological changes into a single value representing the severity of the disease. MATERIALS AND
methods268 lateral spine X-rays of 95 patients with OI (median age 5.6 years) were assessed. The findings were classified based on their clinical relevance.
resultsThe three criteria, vertebral compression, thoracolumbar kyphosis and deformity type, were quantified in a new grading system. Based on this, a "severity classification" (1 to 5) was defined with implications for diagnostics and treatment. A mathematical formula that takes into account the three criteria and their correlations to clinical relevance, resulting in a "severity score", was developed.
conclusion"Severity classification" and "severity score" introduce a new concept for a standardized evaluation of spine X-rays in patients with OI. For both scientific and routine purposes, it provides the user with a simple and easy-to-handle tool for assessing and comparing different stages of severity prior to and during therapy with detailed accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.