Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22722661›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2012

Effect of skeletal muscle Na(+) channel delivered via a cell platform on cardiac conduction and arrhythmia induction.

Gerard J J Boink, Jia Lu, Helen E Driessen, Lian Duan, Eugene A Sosunov, Evgeny P Anyukhovsky, Iryna N Shlapakova, David H Lau, Tove S Rosen, Peter Danilo and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prokaryotic voltage-gated sodium channels are more effective than endogenous NaAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. CD271Cells · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gerard J J BoinkDepartment of Pharmacology, Center for Molecular Therapeutics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Jia Lu
Helen E Driessen
Lian Duan
Eugene A Sosunov
Evgeny P Anyukhovsky
Iryna N Shlapakova
David H Lau
Tove S Rosen
Peter Danilo
Zhiheng Jia
Nazira Ozgen
Yevgeniy Bobkov
Yuanjian Guo
Peter R Brink
Yelena Kryukova
Richard B Robinson
Emilia Entcheva
Ira S Cohen
Michael R Rosen
Academic Medical Center · NLNetherlands Heart Institute · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Novel ion channel approaches to reentrant arrythymiasR01HL094410 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI COHEN, IRA S · 2009 to 2013
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL094410NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn depolarized myocardial infarct epicardial border zones, the cardiac sodium channel is largely inactivated, contributing to slow conduction and reentry. We have demonstrated that adenoviral delivery of the skeletal muscle Na(+) channel (SkM1) to epicardial border zones normalizes conduction and reduces induction of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. We now studied the impact of canine mesenchymal stem cells (cMSCs) in delivering SkM1. METHODS AND

resultscMSCs were isolated and transfected with SkM1. Coculture experiments showed cMSC/SkM1 but not cMSC alone and maintained fast conduction at depolarized potentials. We studied 3 groups in the canine 7d infarct: sham, cMSC, and cMSC/SkM1. In vivo epicardial border zones electrograms were broad and fragmented in sham, narrower in cMSCs, and narrow and unfragmented in cMSC/SkM1 (P<0.05). During programmed electrical stimulation of epicardial border zones, QRS duration in cMSC/SkM1 was shorter than in cMSC and sham (P<0.05). Programmed electrical stimulation-induced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was equivalent in all groups (P>0.05).

conclusioncMSCs provide efficient delivery of SkM1 current. The interventions performed (cMSCs or cMSC/SkM1) were neither antiarrhythmic nor proarrhythmic. Comparing outcomes with cMSC/SkM1 and viral gene delivery highlights the criticality of the delivery platform to SkM1 antiarrhythmic efficacy.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAction PotentialsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalDogsElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMuscle ProteinsMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelMuscle ProteinsNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelScn4a protein, ratSCN5A protein, humanScn5a protein, ratSodiumSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID22722661
PMCPMC3427660
OpenAlexW2116017012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.