Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22722377›Full record

ArticleCancer gene therapy2012

Semliki Forest virus biodistribution in tumor-free and 4T1 mammary tumor-bearing mice: a comparison of transgene delivery by recombinant virus particles and naked RNA replicon.

J Vasilevska, D Skrastina, K Spunde, H Garoff, T Kozlovska, A Zajakina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer gene therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Arboviruses in Cancer therapy: pros and cons.Journal of neurovirology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Bacteria and RNA virus inactivation with a high-irradiance UV-A source.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Article
  5. mRNA vaccination in breast cancer: current progress and future direction.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Viral Replicon Systems and Their Biosafety Aspects.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Journal of photochemistry and photobiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Alphaviruses in Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Self-Amplifying RNA Viruses as RNA Vaccines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Generation and FunctionalFrontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J VasilevskaDepartment of Protein Engineering, Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia.
D Skrastina
K Spunde
H Garoff
T Kozlovska
A Zajakina
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre · LVKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semliki Forest virus (SFV) vectors are promising tools for cancer gene therapy because they ensure a high level of transgene expression and a rapid and strong cytopathic effect. However, broad tissue tropism and transient expression make it more difficult to develop an optimal cancer treatment strategy. In this study, we have compared the distribution of recombinant SFV particles (recSFV) and naked viral RNA replicon (recRNA) in tumor-free and 4T1 mammary tumor-bearing mice as a consequence of different vector administration strategies. The high potential of SFV recRNA as a biosafe approach for the development of therapeutic treatment was demonstrated. Intravenous (i.v.) inoculation of recRNA provided primary brain targeting in both tumor-free and 4T1 tumor mouse models, but local intratumoral inoculation revealed a high expression level in tumors. Moreover, we observed the predominant tumor targeting of recSFV at a reduced viral dose on i.v. and intraperitoneal (i.p.) virus inoculation, whereas the dose increase led to a broad virus distribution in mice. To prolong transgene expression, we have tested several i.v. and i.p. reinoculation strategies. A detailed evaluation of vector distribution and readministration properties could have an impact on cancer gene therapy clinical trial safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic TherapyNeoplasms, ExperimentalAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic VectorsHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CRepliconRNASemliki forest virusTransgenesVirionRNA

Identifiers

PMID22722377
OpenAlexW2029066193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.