Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22722194›Full record

ArticleNature2012

Large-scale prediction and testing of drug activity on side-effect targets.

Eugen Lounkine, Michael J Keiser, Steven Whitebread, Dmitri Mikhailov, Jacques Hamon, Jeremy L Jenkins, Paul Lavan, Eckhard Weber, Allison K Doak, Serge Côté and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 343 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
343citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
104.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

343 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 886 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

283 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Eugen LounkineNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Michael J Keiser
Steven Whitebread
Dmitri Mikhailov
Jacques Hamon
Jeremy L Jenkins
Paul Lavan
Eckhard Weber
Allison K Doak
Serge Côté
Brian K Shoichet
Laszlo Urban
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of California, San Francisco · USNovartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchNovartis (United States) · USSeaChange Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

VIRAL DEGENERATIVE DEMENTING DISEASE IN AGING (SUPP)P01AG002132 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 1985 to 2024
$51.7M
A Web-Based Automatic Virtual Screening SystemR01GM071896 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI IRWIN, JOHN J. · 2004 to 2024
$6.0M
A platform to predict side-effect targets for drugsR44GM093456 · NIGMS · SEACHANGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI HODGE, CARL NICHOLAS, KEISER, MICHAEL JAMES · 2013 to 2014
$910k
Drug Repurposing using Pharmacological NetworksR43GM093456 · NIGMS · SEACHANGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI KEISER, MICHAEL JAMES · 2010 to 2010
$203k
NIA NIH HHS AG002132NIA NIH HHS P01 AG002132NIGMS NIH HHS GM71896NIGMS NIH HHS GM93456NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071896NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM093456NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM093456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering the unintended 'off-targets' that predict adverse drug reactions is daunting by empirical methods alone. Drugs can act on several protein targets, some of which can be unrelated by conventional molecular metrics, and hundreds of proteins have been implicated in side effects. Here we use a computational strategy to predict the activity of 656 marketed drugs on 73 unintended 'side-effect' targets. Approximately half of the predictions were confirmed, either from proprietary databases unknown to the method or by new experimental assays. Affinities for these new off-targets ranged from 1 nM to 30 μM. To explore relevance, we developed an association metric to prioritize those new off-targets that explained side effects better than any known target of a given drug, creating a drug-target-adverse drug reaction network. Among these new associations was the prediction that the abdominal pain side effect of the synthetic oestrogen chlorotrianisene was mediated through its newly discovered inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase-1. The clinical relevance of this inhibition was borne out in whole human blood platelet aggregation assays. This approach may have wide application to de-risking toxicological liabilities in drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsBlood PlateletsChlorotrianiseneCyclooxygenase 1Cyclooxygenase InhibitorsDatabases, FactualDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEstrogens, Non-SteroidalForecastingHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Targeted TherapyPlatelet AggregationReproducibility of ResultsSubstrate SpecificityToxicity TestsChlorotrianiseneCyclooxygenase 1Cyclooxygenase InhibitorsEstrogens, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID22722194
PMCPMC3383642
OpenAlexW2070789802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.