Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22720754›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2012

Comparison of the absolute and relative efficiencies of electroporation-based transfection protocols for Plasmodium falciparum.

Sandra Hasenkamp, Karen T Russell, Paul Horrocks

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Profiling 26S Proteasome Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mutation in the 26S proteasome regulatory subunitFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Establishment of a stable transfection and gene targeting system inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Heterologous expression inFEBS open bio · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The cytosolic glyoxalases ofMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandra HasenkampInstitute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Karen T Russell
Paul Horrocks

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002405/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral electroporation protocols exist to transfect exogenous DNA into Plasmodium falciparum. To date, however, only a subjective analysis of their relative efficiencies has been reported.

methodsA time-course of luciferase reporter expression is used to provide an objective quantitative analysis of the absolute efficiency of three electroporation techniques; direct electroporation of ring stage infected erythrocytes, preloading of erythrocytes and a novel "double-tap" protocol that combines both approaches.

resultsPreloading of erythrocytes shows a mean efficiency of 9.59 x 10(-6), some 5-180 fold more efficient than matched experiments utilizing the "double-tap" and direct electroporation of ring stage infected erythrocytes alone, respectively.

conclusionEvidence presented here provides the first quantitative assessment of both the absolute and relative efficiencies of a key molecular tool used to study the biology and pathogenesis of this important human pathogen.

Indexed as

ElectroporationGenes, ReporterLuciferasesMolecular BiologyParasitologyPlasmodium falciparumTransfectionLuciferases

Identifiers

PMID22720754
PMCPMC3407700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.