Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22720093›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Evaluation of 16S rDNA-based community profiling for human microbiome research.

Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2013
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group

Funding

Large Scale Genome SequencingU54HG003079 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUTCHER, SUSAN K · 2004 to 2016
$445.7M
The Human Genome Sequencing CenterU54HG003273 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GIBBS, RICHARD A · 2004 to 2015
$341.3M
Sequencing the Human MicrobiomeU54HG004968 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WEINSTOCK, GEORGE M · 2009 to 2012
$16.7M
A Quality Assurance, Coordination and Analysis Center for HMPU01HG004866 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WHITE, OWEN R · 2008 to 2012
$12.5M
Construction Of A Reference Sequence Data Set For The Human Microbiome ProjectU54AI084844 · NIAID · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI NELSON, KAREN E. · 2009 to 2012
$10.3M
Defining the Human MicrobiomeU54HG004969 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BIRREN, BRUCE W. · 2009 to 2012
$10.3M
A Microbial Genome Reference Platform for MetagenomicsU54HG004973 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GIBBS, RICHARD A, HIGHLANDER, SARAH KATHERINE · 2009 to 2010
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS 1U01HG004866NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004866NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003079NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG003079NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003273NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004968NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG004968NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004969NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG004969NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004973NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG004973NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900001CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900008CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900018CNIAID NIH HHS U54 AI084844NIAID NIH HHS U54AI084844PHS HHS HHSN2722009000018C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Human Microbiome Project will establish a reference data set for analysis of the microbiome of healthy adults by surveying multiple body sites from 300 people and generating data from over 12,000 samples. To characterize these samples, the participating sequencing centers evaluated and adopted 16S rDNA community profiling protocols for ABI 3730 and 454 FLX Titanium sequencing. In the course of establishing protocols, we examined the performance and error characteristics of each technology, and the relationship of sequence error to the utility of 16S rDNA regions for classification- and OTU-based analysis of community structure. The data production protocols used for this work are those used by the participating centers to produce 16S rDNA sequence for the Human Microbiome Project. Thus, these results can be informative for interpreting the large body of clinical 16S rDNA data produced for this project.

Indexed as

MetagenomeBacteriaBayes TheoremHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID22720093
PMCPMC3374619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.