ArticlePloS one2012
Prediction of protein domain with mRMR feature selection and analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance Feature Selection-Application on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Dataset.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Structure-Based Approaches for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Computational Identification of Milk Trait Regulation Through Transcription Factor Cooperation in Murciano-Granadina Goats.Biology · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Based Feature Selection Algorithm for Small Targets Based on mRMR.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Deciphering Pleiotropic Signatures of Regulatory SNPs inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Computational Identification of Guillain-Barré Syndrome-Related Genes by an mRNA Gene Expression Profile and a Protein-Protein Interaction Network.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Radiogenomic analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with diffuse gliomas.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019Article
- iProEP: A Computational Predictor for Predicting Promoter.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2019Article
- iMethylK_pseAAC: Improving Accuracy of Lysine Methylation Sites Identification by Incorporating Statistical Moments and Position Relative Features into General PseAACCurrent genomics · 2019Article
- Identification of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Genes and a Novel High-Risk Breast Cancer Prediction Model Development Based on PPI Data and Support Vector Machines.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- PhoglyStruct: Prediction of phosphoglycerylated lysine residues using structural properties of amino acids.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- PhosphoPredict: A bioinformatics tool for prediction of human kinase-specific phosphorylation substrates and sites by integrating heterogeneous feature selection.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Identification of compound-protein interactions through the analysis of gene ontology, KEGG enrichment for proteins and molecular fragments of compounds.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2016Article
- Prediction of aptamer-protein interacting pairs using an ensemble classifier in combination with various protein sequence attributes.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- iACP: a sequence-based tool for identifying anticancer peptides.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- DNABP: Identification of DNA-Binding Proteins Based on Feature Selection Using a Random Forest and Predicting Binding Residues.PloS one · 2016Article
- An Ensemble Method to Distinguish Bacteriophage Virion from Non-Virion Proteins Based on Protein Sequence Characteristics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Article
- Prediction of O-glycosylation sites based on multi-scale composition of amino acids and feature selection.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2015Article
- Classifying ten types of major cancers based on reverse phase protein array profiles.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The domains are the structural and functional units of proteins. With the avalanche of protein sequences generated in the postgenomic age, it is highly desired to develop effective methods for predicting the protein domains according to the sequences information alone, so as to facilitate the structure prediction of proteins and speed up their functional annotation. However, although many efforts have been made in this regard, prediction of protein domains from the sequence information still remains a challenging and elusive problem. Here, a new method was developed by combing the techniques of RF (random forest), mRMR (maximum relevance minimum redundancy), and IFS (incremental feature selection), as well as by incorporating the features of physicochemical and biochemical properties, sequence conservation, residual disorder, secondary structure, and solvent accessibility. The overall success rate achieved by the new method on an independent dataset was around 73%, which was about 28-40% higher than those by the existing method on the same benchmark dataset. Furthermore, it was revealed by an in-depth analysis that the features of evolution, codon diversity, electrostatic charge, and disorder played more important roles than the others in predicting protein domains, quite consistent with experimental observations. It is anticipated that the new method may become a high-throughput tool in annotating protein domains, or may, at the very least, play a complementary role to the existing domain prediction methods, and that the findings about the key features with high impacts to the domain prediction might provide useful insights or clues for further experimental investigations in this area. Finally, it has not escaped our notice that the current approach can also be utilized to study protein signal peptides, B-cell epitopes, HIV protease cleavage sites, among many other important topics in protein science and biomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.