Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22719236›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2012

Visualization and analysis of 3D microscopic images.

Fuhui Long, Jianlong Zhou, Hanchuan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tissue clearing applications in memory engram research.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Visualizing and Quantifying Data from Time-Lapse Imaging Experiments.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A bird's-eye view of deep learning in bioimage analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Open data and digital morphology.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fuhui LongJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Jianlong Zhou
Hanchuan Peng

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a wide range of biological studies, it is highly desirable to visualize and analyze three-dimensional (3D) microscopic images. In this primer, we first introduce several major methods for visualizing typical 3D images and related multi-scale, multi-time-point, multi-color data sets. Then, we discuss three key categories of image analysis tasks, namely segmentation, registration, and annotation. We demonstrate how to pipeline these visualization and analysis modules using examples of profiling the single-cell gene-expression of C. elegans and constructing a map of stereotyped neurite tracts in a fruit fly brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID22719236
PMCPMC3375219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.