Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22718994›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2012

Lessons from the Johns Hopkins Multi-Disciplinary Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Collaborative.

Michael B Streiff, Howard T Carolan, Deborah B Hobson, Peggy S Kraus, Christine G Holzmueller, Renee Demski, Brandyn D Lau, Paula Biscup-Horn, Peter J Pronovost, Elliott R Haut

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03367364 (Patient Education Bundle vs. Nurses Feedback and Coaching to Prevent Missed Doses of Venous Thromboembolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03367364 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Patient Education Bundle vs. Nurses Feedback and Coaching to Prevent Missed Doses of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis: A Crossover, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled9,657ConditionsVenous Thrombosis (Disorder)ArmsPatient education bundle (PEB),, Nurse feedback and coaching (NFC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael B StreiffDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Howard T Carolan
Deborah B Hobson
Peggy S Kraus
Christine G Holzmueller
Renee Demski
Brandyn D Lau
Paula Biscup-Horn
Peter J Pronovost
Elliott R Haut

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of potentially preventable mortality, morbidity, and increased medical costs. Risk-appropriate prophylaxis can prevent most VTE events, but only a small fraction of patients at risk receive this treatment.

designProspective quality improvement programme.

settingJohns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: A multidisciplinary team established a VTE Prevention Collaborative in 2005. The collaborative applied the four step TRIP (translating research into practice) model to develop and implement a mandatory clinical decision support tool for VTE risk stratification and risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis for all hospitalised adult patients. Initially, paper based VTE order sets were implemented, which were then converted into 16 specialty-specific, mandatory, computerised, clinical decision support modules. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: VTE risk stratification within 24 hours of hospital admission and provision of risk-appropriate, evidence based VTE prophylaxis. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: The VTE team was able to increase VTE risk assessment and ordering of risk-appropriate prophylaxis with paper based order sets to a limited extent, but achieved higher compliance with a computerised clinical decision support tool and the data feedback which it enabled. Risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis increased from 26% to 80% for surgical patients and from 25% to 92% for medical patients in 2011. LESSONS LEARNT: A computerised clinical decision support tool can increase VTE risk stratification and risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis among hospitalised adult patients admitted to a large urban academic medical centre. It is important to ensure the tool is part of the clinician's normal workflow, is mandatory (computerised forcing function), and offers the requisite modules needed for every clinical specialty.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDecision Making, Computer-AssistedQuality ImprovementAdultAnticoagulantsBaltimoreEvidence-Based MedicineHospitalizationHumansMedical Order Entry SystemsOrganizational InnovationPatient Care TeamPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID22718994
PMCPMC4688421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.