Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22718317›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2012

Computational modeling of the human atrial anatomy and electrophysiology.

Olaf Dössel, Martin W Krueger, Frank M Weber, Mathias Wilhelms, Gunnar Seemann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Polygonal surface processing and mesh generation tools for the numerical simulation of the cardiac function.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Computational models in cardiology.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olaf DösselInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. olaf.doessel@kit.edu
Martin W Krueger
Frank M Weber
Mathias Wilhelms
Gunnar Seemann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article gives a comprehensive survey of the progress made in computational modeling of the human atria during the last 10 years. Modeling the anatomy has emerged from simple "peanut"-like structures to very detailed models including atrial wall and fiber direction. Electrophysiological models started with just two cellular models in 1998. Today, five models exist considering e.g. details of intracellular compartments and atrial heterogeneity. On the pathological side, modeling atrial remodeling and fibrotic tissue are the other important aspects. The bridge to data that are measured in the catheter laboratory and on the body surface (ECG) is under construction. Every measurement can be used either for model personalization or for validation. Potential clinical applications are briefly outlined and future research perspectives are suggested.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAction PotentialsAnimalsAtrial FunctionComputer SimulationElectrocardiographyHeart Conduction SystemHumansMyocytes, Cardiac

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.