Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22718310›Full record

ArticlePlanta2012

A critique of widely used normalization software tools and an alternative method to identify reliable reference genes in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.).

Khosro Mehdi Khanlou, Erik Van Bockstaele

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Validation of Appropriate Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Normalization in Oat (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Selection of reference genes for reverse transcription-qPCR analysis in the biomonitor macrophytePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Profiling Gene Expression in GerminatingPlant molecular biology reporter · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khosro Mehdi KhanlouDepartment of Plant Production, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. mehdikhanlou.khosro@ugent.be
Erik Van Bockstaele
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of appropriate reference genes is crucial to normalization of gene expression data and prevention of biased results in qRT-PCR studies. This study is the first attempt to systematically compare potential reference genes to detect the most constitutively expressed reference genes for accurate normalization in red clover tissues including leaves, stems and roots. To identify the best-suited reference gene(s) for normalization, several statistical algorithms such as geNorm, BestKeeper and NormFinder have been developed. All these algorithms are based on the key assumption that none of the investigated candidate reference genes show systematic variation in their expression profile across the samples being considered. However, this assumption is likely to be violated in practice. The authors therefore suggest a simple and novel stability index based on the analysis of variance model which is free from the assumption made by the algorithms. We assessed the expression stability of eight candidate reference genes including actin (ACT), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GADPH), elongation factor-1alpha (EF-1α), translation initiation factor (EIF-4a), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 (UBC2), polyubiquitin (UBQ10), sand family protein (SAND) and yellow-leaf-specific protein 8 (YLS8). Our results indicated that UBC2 and UBQ10 ranked as the two most stably expressed genes in leaf tissue. UBC2 and YLS8 were defined as optimal control genes for stem tissue. EIF-4a and UBC2 were found to be the most stable reference gene for root tissue. GAPDH and SAND showed relatively low stability in expression study of red clover. When all tested tissues were considered, we observed that YLS8 and UBC2 showed remarkable stability in their expression level across tissues.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantSoftwareAlgorithmsAnalysis of VarianceEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4AGene Expression ProfilingGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPolymerase Chain ReactionTrifoliumUbiquitin-Conjugating EnzymesEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4AGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesPlant ProteinsUbiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID22718310
OpenAlexW2072965944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.