Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22718131›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2012

Evaluation of three commercial varicella-zoster virus IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in comparison to the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen test.

Andreas Sauerbrei, Anna Schäfler, Jörg Hofmann, Michael Schacke, Bernd Gruhn, Peter Wutzler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02775422 (Comparison of Serological Tests for the Varicella-zoster Virus and Correlation With the Memory of the Infection or Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02775422 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Serological Tests for the Varicella-zoster Virus and Correlation With the Memory of the Infection or Vaccination

TypeinterventionalSponsorHopital FochRan2015 to 2020Enrolled308ConditionsPregnancyArmsSerological Test s for the Virus Chicken Pox Virus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Against vaccine assay secrecy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas SauerbreiInstitute of Virology and Antiviral Therapy, German Reference Laboratory for HSV and VZV, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany. Andreas.Sauerbrei@med.uni-jena.de
Anna Schäfler
Jörg Hofmann
Michael Schacke
Bernd Gruhn
Peter Wutzler
Jena University Hospital · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercial serologic assays for varicella-zoster virus (VZV), which enable reliable determination of VZV immune status and are amenable to automation, are needed. The present study compares the automated performance of the VZV whole-cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Enzygnost anti-VZV/IgG, the Euroimmun anti-VZV ELISA (IgG) based on highly purified viral proteins, and the VZV glycoprotein (gp)-based Serion ELISA Classic VZV IgG. The fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antibody (FAMA) test was used as a reference. A total of 638 serum samples from VZV-negative children, blood donors, varicella vaccinees, and bone marrow transplant recipients were included. The Enzygnost anti-VZV/IgG and the Serion ELISA Classic VZV IgG showed sensitivities of 99.6% and 99.2%, respectively, and the Euroimmun anti-VZV ELISA (IgG) had a significantly lower sensitivity of 90.5%. Specificity was calculated as 100% for both the Euroimmun anti-VZV ELISA (IgG) and for the Enzygnost anti-VZV/IgG, and the Serion ELISA Classic VZV IgG had a significantly lower specificity of 89.4%. Quantitative results of all ELISAs correlated well, but there was a poor quantitative correlation between the ELISAs and FAMA. In conclusion, this study does not show any superiority of a gp- and a protein-based ELISA compared to a whole-cell ELISA for the automated detection of VZV-specific IgG. The automated performance of the Enzygnost anti-VZV/IgG assay correlated best with the FAMA reference assay.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralAutomationChildChild, PreschoolEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHerpesvirus 3, HumanHumansImmunoglobulin GInfantMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID22718131
PMCPMC3416097
OpenAlexW2170568524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.