ReviewMolecular neurobiology2012
Neural regeneration: lessons from regenerating and non-regenerating systems.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics technologies: Novel tools and methods for assessing nerve injury and regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Nexus: The Role of Collapsin Response Mediator Protein 2 Phosphorylation in Neurodegeneration and Neuroregeneration.Neuromolecular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Monitoring Autophagy in Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Enriched conditioning expands the regenerative ability of sensory neurons after spinal cord injury via neuronal intrinsic redox signaling.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Phosphoinositide 5- and 3-phosphatase activities of a voltage-sensing phosphatase in living cells show identical voltage dependence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- Endogenous bioelectric fields: a putative regulator of wound repair and regeneration in the central nervous system.Neural regeneration research · 2016Review
- Article
- Anatomical and electrophysiological plasticity of locomotor networks following spinal transection in the salamander.Neuroscience bulletin · 2013Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One only needs to see a salamander regrowing a lost limb to become fascinated by regeneration. However, the lack of robust axonal regeneration models for which good cellular and molecular tools exist has hampered progress in the field. Nevertheless, the nervous system has been revealed to be an excellent model to investigate regeneration. There are conspicuous differences in neuroregeneration capacity between amphibia and warm-blooded animals, as well as between the central and the peripheral nervous systems in mammals. Exploration of such discrepancies led to significant discoveries on the basic tenets of neuroregeneration in the last two decades, identifying several positive and negative regulators of axonal regeneration. Implications of these findings to the comprehension of mammalian regeneration and to the development of spinal cord injury therapies are also addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22717989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.