ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2012
Direct and indirect exposure to horse: risk for sensitization and asthma.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why Is the Prevention of Passive Transport of Cat Allergens So Important in Clinical Practice?Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
- Sensitization to Horse Allergens-Molecular Analysis Based on the Results of Multiparameter Tests.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Diagnostics of Allergy to Furry Animals-Possibilities in 2024.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Inhalant Mammal-Derived Lipocalin Allergens and the Innate Immunity.Frontiers in allergy · 2021Review
- Equine Hypersensitivity: the Dark Horse of Allergy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2020Review
- Nasal Provocation Test with Cat and Dog Extracts: Results according to Molecular Components.Pulmonary medicine · 2020Article
- Immunotherapy for pet allergies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Review
- Article
- Use of a 3-D dispersion model for calculation of distribution of horse allergen and odor around horse facilities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most studies on the sensitization to horse allergens in populations without professional exposure have been carried out in geographical areas where the rate of horse ownership is high and horse riding is popular. Very few studies have been carried out in populations living in large urban areas. This gap in the literature probably reflects the widespread view that prevalence of horse-related allergy is low in urban populations because the latter are not regularly exposed to horses. On the contrary, we suggest that urban areas constitute a model useful to study potential modalities of exposure and sensitization to horse allergen by other routes of exposure than horse-riding. In this article, we describe the risks related to various modalities of exposure to horse allergen, clinical aspects of airway sensitization to horse allergens in patients living in urban areas, and non-occupational exposure to horse allergen. In addition, we illuminate some aspects related to dispersion of horse allergens from sources such as stables to indoor environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.