Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22716296›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2012

Systematic assessment of microneedle injection into the mouse cornea.

Mario Matthaei, Huan Meng, Imran Bhutto, Qingguo Xu, Edwin Boelke, Justin Hanes, Albert S Jun

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Controlled release of corticosteroid with biodegradable nanoparticles for treating experimental autoimmune uveitis.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mario MatthaeiThe Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Huan Meng
Imran Bhutto
Qingguo Xu
Edwin Boelke
Justin Hanes
Albert S Jun
Johns Hopkins University · USDüsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

Role of unfolded protein response and COL8A2 in Fuchs corneal dystrophyR01EY019874 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JUN, ALBERT S · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Role of Alpha 2 Collagen VIII in Fuchs Corneal DystrophyK08EY015523 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JUN, ALBERT S · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS KO8EY15523NEI NIH HHS R01EY19874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorneal intrastromal injection is an important mode of gene-vector application to subepithelial layers. In a mouse model, this procedure is substantially complicated by the reduced corneal dimensions. Furthermore, it may be difficult to estimate the corneal area reached by the volume of a single injection. This study aimed to investigate intrastromal injections into the mouse cornea using different microneedles and to quantify the effect of injecting varying volumes. A reproducible injection technique is described.

methodsForty eyes of 20 129 Sv/J mice were tested. India ink was intrastromally injected using 30° beveled 33 G needles, tri-surface 25° beveled 35 G needles, or hand-pulled and 25° beveled glass needles. Each eye received a single injection of a volume of 1 or 2 μL. Corneoscleral buttons were fixed and flat mounted for computer-assisted quantification of the affected corneal area. Histological assessment was performed to investigate the intrastromal location of the injected dye.

resultsA mean corneal area of 5.0 ± 1.4 mm(2) (mean ± SD) and 7.7 ± 1.4 mm(2) was covered by intrastromal injections of 1 and 2 μL, respectively. The mean percentage of total corneal area reached ranged from 39% to 53% for 1 μL injections, and from 65% to 81% for 2 μL injections. Injections using the 33 G needles tended to provide the highest distribution area. Perforation rates were 8% for 30° beveled 33 G needles and 44% for tri-surface beveled 35 G needles. No perforation was observed with glass needle; however, intrastromal breakage of needle tips was noted in 25% of these cases.

conclusionsIntracorneal injection using a 30° beveled 33 G needle was safe and effective. The use of tri-surface beveled 35 G needles substantially increased the number of corneal perforations. Glass needles may break inside the corneal stroma. Injections of 1 μL and 2 μL resulted in an overall mean of 49% and 73% respectively of total corneal area involved.

Indexed as

NeedlesAnimalsCarbonCorneaGlassMiceMice, 129 StrainMicroinjectionsReproducibility of ResultsStatistics, NonparametricSyringesTissue FixationCarbonchinese ink

Identifiers

PMID22716296
PMCPMC3478193
OpenAlexW2168937070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.