Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22715861›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2012

Antimuscarinic treatment in overactive bladder: special considerations in elderly patients.

Adrian S Wagg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The aging bladder insights from animal models.Asian journal of urology · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adrian S WaggDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Adrian.wagg@ualberta.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overactive bladder is a common condition that increases in prevalence in association with age. Antimuscarinic therapy remains the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for the condition, and there is an increasing body of evidence that supports the use of these drugs. Despite this, and because of concerns about associated adverse effects, older people are less likely to receive active treatment for their condition. This review considers some of the factors that need to be taken into account when using these medications.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsCardiovascular SystemHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsPolypharmacyUrinary Bladder, OveractiveMuscarinic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID22715861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.