A commentary on changing infant death rates and a plea to use sudden infant death syndrome as a cause of death.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Paediatricians' Practice About SUDDEN Infant Death Syndrome in Catalonia, Spain.Maternal and child health journal · 2017
   Article
2. A Fresh Look at the History of SIDS.Academic forensic pathology · 2017
   Review
3. Sudden infant death syndrome: an unrecognized killer in developing countries.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2016
   Review
4. Comment on: A commentary on changing infant death rates and a plea to use sudden infant death syndrome as a cause of death.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Comment on: A commentary on changing infant death rates and a plea to use sudden infant death syndrome as a cause of death.2013
• Comment on
  Changing infant death rates: diagnostic shift, success story, or both?2013

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as