ArticleGenetics2012
Patterns of neutral diversity under general models of selective sweeps.
Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ubiquitous impact of natural selection on nucleotide diversity in 178 species of primates.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Genetic Footprints of Seasonal Fluctuating Selection: A Comparison With Established Selection Forms.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- When should adaptation arise from a polygenic response versus few large effect changes?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Pervasive Conservation of Intron Number and Other Genetic Elements Revealed by a Chromosome-level Genome Assembly of the Hyper-polymorphic Nematode Caenorhabditis brenneri.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Pervasive conservation of intron number and other genetic elements revealed by a chromosome-level genomic assembly of the hyper-polymorphic nematodebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Genomic diversity landscapes in outcrossing and selfing Caenorhabditis nematodes.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Linkage disequilibrium between rare mutations.Genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Discovery of Ongoing Selective Sweeps within Anopheles Mosquito Populations Using Deep Learning.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?Genetics · 2020Article
- Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two major sources of stochasticity in the dynamics of neutral alleles result from resampling of finite populations (genetic drift) and the random genetic background of nearby selected alleles on which the neutral alleles are found (linked selection). There is now good evidence that linked selection plays an important role in shaping polymorphism levels in a number of species. One of the best-investigated models of linked selection is the recurrent full-sweep model, in which newly arisen selected alleles fix rapidly. However, the bulk of selected alleles that sweep into the population may not be destined for rapid fixation. Here we develop a general model of recurrent selective sweeps in a coalescent framework, one that generalizes the recurrent full-sweep model to the case where selected alleles do not sweep to fixation. We show that in a large population, only the initial rapid increase of a selected allele affects the genealogy at partially linked sites, which under fairly general assumptions are unaffected by the subsequent fate of the selected allele. We also apply the theory to a simple model to investigate the impact of recurrent partial sweeps on levels of neutral diversity and find that for a given reduction in diversity, the impact of recurrent partial sweeps on the frequency spectrum at neutral sites is determined primarily by the frequencies rapidly achieved by the selected alleles. Consequently, recurrent sweeps of selected alleles to low frequencies can have a profound effect on levels of diversity but can leave the frequency spectrum relatively unperturbed. In fact, the limiting coalescent model under a high rate of sweeps to low frequency is identical to the standard neutral model. The general model of selective sweeps we describe goes some way toward providing a more flexible framework to describe genomic patterns of diversity than is currently available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.