Trial reportAnesthesiology2012
Aversive and reinforcing opioid effects: a pharmacogenomic twin study.
Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05639712 (Understanding Opioid Use Before and After Surgery in Norway), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Understanding Opioid Use Before and After Surgery in Norway: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel associations between FAAH genetic variants and postoperative central opioid-related adverse effects.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2015Trial
- Health and social problems associated with prescription opioid misuse among a diverse sample of substance-using MSM.Substance use & misuse · 2014Trial
- Initial Drug Sensitivity and Vulnerability to Substance Use Disorders: A Review of Individual Influences.Biology · 2026Review
- Interactive interdisciplinary pain research in adolescent and young adult females: a pilot investigation of brain, physiological, and emotional functioning following orthopedic surgery.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Article
- Opioid Regulation of Social Homeostasis: Connecting Loneliness to Addiction.Biological psychiatry · 2025Review
- A master regulator of opioid reward in the ventral prefrontal cortex.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Macrophage memories of early-life injury drive neonatal nociceptive priming.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Mu Opioid Receptor-Expressing Neurons in the Dorsal Raphe Nucleus Are Involved in Reward Processing and Affective Behaviors.Biological psychiatry · 2023Article
- Developmental impact of peripheral injury on neuroimmune signaling.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2023Review
- Observational
- An electroencephalogram biomarker of fentanyl drug effects.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Association of Postsurgical Opioid Refills for Patients With Risk of Opioid Misuse and Chronic Opioid Use Among Family Members.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Review
- Short Tandem Repeat Variation in theFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Retrospectively assessed subjective effects of initial opioid use differ between opioid misusers with opioid use disorder (OUD) and those who never progressed to OUD: Data from a pilot and a replication sample.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022Article
- Unravelling the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus.Clinical kidney journal · 2021Review
- Identification of a sex-stratified genetic algorithm for opioid addiction risk.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2021Article
- The Role of Mu-Opioids for Reward and Threat Processing in Humans: Bridging the Gap from Preclinical to Clinical Opioid Drug Studies.Current addiction reports · 2021Review
- An update on the safety of prescribing opioids in pediatrics.Expert opinion on drug safety · 2019Review
- Codeine and opioid metabolism: implications and alternatives for pediatric pain management.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byIn reply.2013
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical utility of opioids is limited by adverse drug effects including respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, and pruritus. In addition, abuse of prescription opioids is problematic. Gaining a better understanding of the genetic and environmental mechanisms contributing to an individual's susceptibility to adverse opioid effects is essential to identify patients at risk.
methodsA classic twin study paradigm provided estimates for the genetic and familial (genetic and/or shared environment) contribution to acute adverse and affective opioid responses, all secondary outcomes of a larger dataset. One hundred twenty-one twin pairs were recruited in a single occasion, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. The μ-opioid receptor agonist alfentanil and saline placebo were administered as target-controlled infusions under carefully monitored laboratory conditions. Measured outcomes included respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, pruritus, drug liking, and drug disliking. Demographic information was collected, and aspects of mood and sleep were evaluated.
resultsSignificant heritability was detected for respiratory depression (30%), nausea (59%), and drug disliking (36%). Significant familial effects were detected for sedation (29%), pruritus (38%), dizziness (32%), and drug liking (26%). Significant covariates included age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, mood, and depression. Covariates affected sedation, pruritus, drug liking and disliking, and dizziness.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that large-scale efforts to collect quantitative and well-defined opioid response data are not only feasible but also produce data that are suitable for genetic analysis. Genetic, environmental, and demographic factors work together to control adverse and reinforcing opioid responses, but contribute differently to specific responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.