Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22713632›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2012

Aversive and reinforcing opioid effects: a pharmacogenomic twin study.

Martin S Angst, Laura C Lazzeroni, Nicholas G Phillips, David R Drover, Martha Tingle, Amrita Ray, Gary E Swan, J David Clark

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialTwin Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05639712 (Understanding Opioid Use Before and After Surgery in Norway), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05639712 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Understanding Opioid Use Before and After Surgery in Norway: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,020ConditionsOpioid Use, Affective SymptomsArmsPlacebo, Morphine 2.5 mg i.v., Morphine 5 mg i.v., Morphine 10 mg i.v., Oxycodone 2.5 mg i.v.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Short Tandem Repeat Variation in theFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin S AngstDepartment of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5117, USA. ang@stanford.edu
Laura C Lazzeroni
Nicholas G Phillips
David R Drover
Martha Tingle
Amrita Ray
Gary E Swan
J David Clark

Funding

Opioid Efficacy In Humans: A Twin StudyR01DA023063 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ANGST, MARTIN STEPHAN, CLARK, DAVID J. · 2008 to 2010
$1.4M
6/6 - The Genetics of Endophenotypes and SchizophreniaR01MH086135 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LAZZERONI, LAURA C. · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023063NIDA NIH HHS R01DA023063NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086135NIMH NIH HHS R01MH086135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical utility of opioids is limited by adverse drug effects including respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, and pruritus. In addition, abuse of prescription opioids is problematic. Gaining a better understanding of the genetic and environmental mechanisms contributing to an individual's susceptibility to adverse opioid effects is essential to identify patients at risk.

methodsA classic twin study paradigm provided estimates for the genetic and familial (genetic and/or shared environment) contribution to acute adverse and affective opioid responses, all secondary outcomes of a larger dataset. One hundred twenty-one twin pairs were recruited in a single occasion, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. The μ-opioid receptor agonist alfentanil and saline placebo were administered as target-controlled infusions under carefully monitored laboratory conditions. Measured outcomes included respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, pruritus, drug liking, and drug disliking. Demographic information was collected, and aspects of mood and sleep were evaluated.

resultsSignificant heritability was detected for respiratory depression (30%), nausea (59%), and drug disliking (36%). Significant familial effects were detected for sedation (29%), pruritus (38%), dizziness (32%), and drug liking (26%). Significant covariates included age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, mood, and depression. Covariates affected sedation, pruritus, drug liking and disliking, and dizziness.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that large-scale efforts to collect quantitative and well-defined opioid response data are not only feasible but also produce data that are suitable for genetic analysis. Genetic, environmental, and demographic factors work together to control adverse and reinforcing opioid responses, but contribute differently to specific responses.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdultAlfentanilAnalgesics, OpioidBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGenomicsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedNauseaReceptors, Opioid, muRespirationAlfentanilAnalgesics, OpioidHypnotics and SedativesOPRM1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID22713632
PMCPMC3428265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.