Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22713599›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2012

The unfolded protein response is activated in connexin 50 mutant mouse lenses.

Bhagwat V Alapure, Jaime K Stull, Zeynep Firtina, Melinda K Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Through theGenes · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Focus on lens connexins.BMC cell biology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhagwat V AlapureDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, 327 Wolf Hall, The Green, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Jaime K Stull
Zeynep Firtina
Melinda K Duncan
University of Delaware · US

Funding

VOLUMETRIC BREAST DENSITY ESTIMATION USING BREAST SURFACE RECONSTRUCTEDP20RR016472 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI STANHOPE, STEVEN J. · 2001 to 2011
$37.6M
The Influence of Capsule Composition on Lens BiologyR01EY015279 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI DUNCAN, MELINDA K · 2004 to 2025
$7.8M
Acquisition of a Zeiss LSM710 Confocal MicroscopeS10RR027273 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI DUNCAN, MELINDA K · 2010 to 2010
$494k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016472NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR16472NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027273NEI NIH HHS EY015279NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unfolded protein response is a set of cell signaling pathways recently recognized to be activated in the lens during both normal development and endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by either unfolded proteins or oxidative damage. While mutations in the gene for connexin 50 are known to cause autosomal dominant cataracts, it has not been previously reported whether mutant connexins can activate the unfolded protein response in the lens. Mice homozygous for the S50P or G22R mutation of connexin 50 have reduced amounts of connexin 50 protein at the cell membrane, with some intracellular staining consistent with retention in the endoplasmic reticulum. Connexin 50 mutants have elevated levels of BiP expression in both lens epithelial and fiber cells from E15.5 with the most robust elevation detected in newborns. While this elevation decreases in magnitude postnatally, BiP expression is still abnormally high in adults, particularly in the perinuclear endoplasmic reticulum of cell nuclei that are inappropriately retained in adult homozygous mutant lenses. Xbp1 splicing was elevated in lenses from both connexin mutants studied, while Atf4 and Atf6 levels were not majorly affected. Overall, these data suggest that UPR may be a contributing factor to the phenotype of connexin 50 mutant lenses even though the relatively modest extent of the response suggests that it is unlikely to be a major driver of the pathology.

Indexed as

MutationActivating Transcription Factor 4Activating Transcription Factor 6AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBlotting, WesternCataractConnexin 50ConnexinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEye ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsLens, CrystallineMiceMice, Inbred C57BLActivating Transcription Factor 4Activating Transcription Factor 6Atf4 protein, mouseAtf6 protein, mouseConnexin 50ConnexinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEye ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsX-Box Binding Protein 1Xbp1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22713599
PMCPMC3461258
OpenAlexW2148877366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.