ArticleBiophysical journal2012
Transcription factor oscillations induce differential gene expressions.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Horizontal acquisition of the Type I restriction-modification system enhances bacterial pathogenicity by mediating methylation of transcription factor-encoding genes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Quantification and potential functional relevance of binding cooperativity of adjacent transcription factors on DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Lactate-dependent chaperone-mediated autophagy induces oscillatory HIF-1α activity promoting proliferation of hypoxic cells.Cell systems · 2022Article
- A Hill type equation can predict target gene expression driven by p53 pulsing.FEBS open bio · 2021Article
- Pinning Control for the p53-Mdm2 Network Dynamics Regulated by p14ARF.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Computational analysis of the oscillatory behavior at the translation level induced by mRNA levels oscillations due to finite intracellular resources.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Understanding non-linear effects from Hill-type dynamics with application to decoding of p53 signaling.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Transcription factor oscillations in neural stem cells: Implications for accurate control of gene expression.Neurogenesis (Austin, Tex.) · 2017Review
- Noise Induces Hopping between NF-κB Entrainment Modes.Cell systems · 2016Article
- Elements of biological oscillations in time and space.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2016Article
- Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Part 1--Molecular Pathogenetic Aspects, Hemodynamics, and Adaptive Feedbacks.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2016Review
- Significance of p53 dynamics in regulating apoptosis in response to ionizing radiation, and polypharmacological strategies.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Axon-soma communication in neuronal injury.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracellular protein levels of diverse transcription factors (TFs) vary periodically with time. However, the effects of TF oscillations on gene expression, the primary role of TFs, are poorly understood. In this study, we determined these effects by comparing gene expression levels induced in the presence and in the absence of TF oscillations under same mean intracellular protein level of TF. For all the nonlinear TF transcription kinetics studied, an oscillatory TF is predicted to induce gene expression levels that are distinct from a nonoscillatory TF. The conditions dictating whether TF oscillations induce either higher or lower average gene expression levels were elucidated. Subsequently, the predicted effects from an oscillatory TF, which follows sigmoid transcription kinetics, were applied to demonstrate how oscillatory dynamics provide a mechanism for differential target gene transactivation. Generally, the mean TF concentration at which oscillations occur relative to the promoter binding affinity of a target gene determines whether the gene is up- or downregulated whereas the oscillation amplitude amplifies the magnitude of the differential regulation. Notably, the predicted trends of differential gene expressions induced by oscillatory NF-κB and glucocorticoid receptor match the reported experimental observations. Furthermore, the biological function of p53 oscillations is predicted to prime the cell for death upon DNA damage via differential upregulation of apoptotic genes. Lastly, given N target genes, an oscillatory TF can generate between (N-1) and (2N-1) distinct patterns of differential transactivation. This study provides insights into the mechanism for TF oscillations to induce differential gene expressions, and underscores the importance of TF oscillations in biological regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.