Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22711336›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2012

An effective combination of two different methods of postconditioning.

Viera Danielisova, Jozef Burda, Miroslava Nemethova, Miroslav Gottlieb, Rastislav Burda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Viera DanielisovaInstitute of Neurobiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Soltesovej 4, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia. danielis@saske.sk
Jozef Burda
Miroslava Nemethova
Miroslav Gottlieb
Rastislav Burda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic tolerance based on the synthesis of protective proteins acquires its full strength by repeated exposure to stress, and "the end effector of tolerance" may paradoxically be activated by the second or lethal stress, particularly in the case of preconditioning. That happens when an additional nonspecific stressor is applied either before (preconditioning) or after (postconditioning) the period of lethal ischemia. A combination of antioxidants with pre or postconditioning prevents the acquisition of tolerance, and in the case of more severe attacks repeated stress can lead to accumulation of damage. Our attempt to weaken ischemic injury to hippocampal CA1 with antioxidants applied after lethal stress, i.e. before delayed postconditioning, was ineffective. We then tried using rapid postconditioning consisting of 30-s reperfusion alternating with 15-s ischemia repeated three times and applied immediately at the end of lethal ischemia as a tool decreasing post-ischemic production of reactive oxygen species, and combining that with delayed postconditioning consisting of an i.p. injection of Bradykinin 2 days after lethal ischemia. This approach once more confirmed the efficacy of both rapid as well as delayed postconditioning but, more importantly, it demonstrated the possibility of effectively combining these two procedures. Our findings further confirm that in cases of delayed neuronal death, which is practically pathologically-induced apoptosis, there exists a 2-day-wide therapeutic window that can be effectively exploited.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsBradykininBrain IschemiaEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunohistochemistryMaleRatsRats, WistarReperfusionAntioxidantsBradykinin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.