Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22711220›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2012

Evaluation of an innovative population pharmacokinetic-based design for behavioral pharmacodynamic endpoints.

Anders Viberg, Giovanni Martino, Etienne Lessard, Jennifer M A Laird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Designing More Efficient Preclinical Experiments: A Simulation Study in Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosupression.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Translational PK-PD modeling in pain.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anders VibergClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AstraZeneca R&D Södertälje, 151 85, Södertälje, Sweden. anders.viberg@astrazeneca.com
Giovanni Martino
Etienne Lessard
Jennifer M A Laird

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-clinical behavioral pharmacology studies supporting indications like analgesia typically consist of at least three different studies; dose-finding, duration of effect, and tolerance-development studies. Pharmacokinetic (PK) plasma samples are generally taken from a parallel group of animals to avoid disruption of the behavioral pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint. Our objective was to investigate if pre-clinical behavioral pharmacology studies in rats could be performed effectively by combining three studies into a single experimental design and using sparse PK sampling in the same animals as for PD. A refined dosing strategy was applied for a muscarinic agonist, AZD6088, using the rat spinal nerve ligation heat hyperalgesia model. PD measurements were performed on day 1, 3, 5 and 8. Two PK samples per day were taken day 2 and 4. In a separate control group, PD measurements were performed on rats without PK sampling. Data was analyzed using a population approach in NONMEM. The animals produced a consistent and reproducible response irrespective of day of testing suggesting that blood sampling on alternate days did not interfere with the PD responses. A direct concentration-effect relationship with good precision was established and no tolerance development was observed. The new design combining three studies into one and eliminating a satellite PK group realized substantial savings compared to the old design; animal use was reduced by 58% and time required to generate results was reduced by 55%. The design described here delivers substantial savings in animal lives, time, and money whilst still delivering a good quality and precise description of the PKPD relationship.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCost SavingsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug ToleranceEndpoint DeterminationHyperalgesiaImidazolidinesMaleMuscarinic AgonistsNonlinear DynamicsPiperidinesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAZD6088ImidazolidinesMuscarinic AgonistsPiperidines

Identifiers

PMID22711220
PMCPMC3475849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.