Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22711060›Full record

SynthesisLung2012

Doublet versus single cytotoxic agent as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wei-Xiang Qi, Li-na Tang, Ai-na He, Zan Shen, Feng Lin, Yang Yao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lung, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Clinicopathologic Characteristics of the Patients in the Elderly Lung Carcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2016
    Article
  10. Utility of day 8 blood tests on platinum plus vinorelbine regimen.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei-Xiang QiDepartment of Oncology, The Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Li-na Tang
Ai-na He
Zan Shen
Feng Lin
Yang Yao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of doublet versus single third-generation cytotoxic agent as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsSeveral databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), 1-year survival rate (1-year SR), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE). We performed a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials using a fixed-effects model and an additional random-effects model when applicable. The results of the meta-analysis were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR), with their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). A subgroup meta-analysis was performed based on chemotherapy regimens.

resultsTen eligible trials involving 2,510 patients were identified. The intention-to-treatment (ITT) analysis demonstrated that doublet therapy was superior to single agent in terms of OS (HR = 0.84, 95 % CI = 0.71-1.00, p = 0.053), TTP (HR = 0.76, 95 % CI = 0.60-0.96, p = 0.022), 1-year SR (RR = 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.35, p = 0.03), and ORR (RR = 1.54, 95 % CI = 1.36-1.73, p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis also favored platinum-based doublet therapy in terms of 1-year SR (RR = 1.40, 95 % CI = 1.09-1.81, p = 0.009) and ORR (RR = 1.64, 95 % CI = 1.38-1.96, p = 0.000). Though gemcitabine-based doublet significantly increased ORR compared with single agent (RR = 1.45, 95 % CI = 1.23-1.71, p = 0.000), it did not translate into an increase in survival benefits. In addition, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neurotoxicity were observed in the doublet combination group. With respect to grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and nonhematologic toxicities such as diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting, equivalent frequencies were found between the two groups.

conclusionsOur results indicated that doublet therapy was superior to a single third-generation cytotoxic agent for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The optimal dosage and schedule of platinum-based doublet should be investigated in future prospective clinical trials. Gemcitabine-based doublet could be considered for elderly patients who were not suitable for platinum-based chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleModels, BiologicalNeutropeniaPlatinum CompoundsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePlatinum Compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.