ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2013
Comparison of aortic root measurements in patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT): differences and variability.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of image quality of rotational angiography for on-line assessment of frame geometry after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Observational
- Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2015Article
- Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2013Article
- Editorial comment.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate for the first time the degree of compliance between conventional multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) in measuring relevant dimensions of the aortic annulus, the aortic root and the thoracic aorta in patients undergoing TA-AVI. Twenty-seven patients (82 ± 11 years) with severe aortic stenosis received contrast enhanced ECG gated MSCT prior to TA-AVI and intra-procedural rotational angiography. The aortic annulus size, the distance to the coronary ostia and diameters of the aortic root and the thoracic aorta were measured with both methods by two observers blinded to each other. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to determine the degree of compliance between both methods. The limits of agreement were within two standard deviations for all measurements and with high correlation especially for the supra-annular dimensions. Sizing of the aortic annulus revealed lower interobserver variability for MSCT than for 3D-RA with a maximum deviation of 2.1 ± 2.5 and 1.7 ± 2.8 mm for diameter measurements and for the effective diameter, respectively. With current protocols intra-procedural 3D-RA provides good image quality especially for structures above the aortic annulus. Due to a lower interobserver variability in sizing the aortic annulus MSCT remains more suitable for aortic root assessment prior to TA-AVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.