Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22710970›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2013

Influence of peritoneal dialysis solution on measurements of fluid status by bioimpedance spectroscopy.

Simon Paul Parmentier, Holger Schirutschke, Bertram Schmitt, Jens Schewe, Kay Herbrig, Frank Pistrosch, Jens Passauer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Muscle mass assessment in renal disease: the role of imaging techniques.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Baseline hydration status in incident peritoneal dialysis patients: the initiative of patient outcomes in dialysis (IPOD-PD study)†.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2015
    Observational
  16. Evaluation of body composition and fluid volume using a body composition monitor: does intraperitoneal fluid matter?Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2014
    Article
  17. Intraperitoneal fluid overestimates hydration status assessment by bioimpedance spectroscopy.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon Paul ParmentierDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Dresden, Germany. simon.parmentier@uniklinikum-dresden.de
Holger Schirutschke
Bertram Schmitt
Jens Schewe
Kay Herbrig
Frank Pistrosch
Jens Passauer
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE AND

methodsThe accurate estimation of volume status is a central problem in dialysis patients. Recently, a bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) device (BCM Body Composition Monitor FMC, Germany) has attained growing interest in this regard. By processing the raw data for extracellular water (ECW) and intracellular water (ICW) by means of a validated body composition model, this device allows a quantification of the individual fluid overload (FO) compared to a representative healthy population. In this study, we addressed the issue whether the presence of peritoneal dialysate has an impact on measurements of FO by BIS in PD patients.

resultsForty-two BIS measurements using the BCM device were performed both in the absence (D-) and presence (D+) of peritoneal dialysate in 17 stable PD patients. Data for ECW, ICW and FO (D+; D-) were analyzed by paired t test and linear regression. Mean FO was 0.99 ± 1.17 L in D- and 0.94 ± 1.27 in D+ (p = n.s. paired t test). Linear regression demonstrated an excellent degree of conformity between FO (D-) and FO (D+) (r (2) = 0.93).

conclusionThe presence of peritoneal fluid in PD patients has a negligible influence on measurements of FO by BIS. The BIS measurements can be therefore conveniently and reliably done without emptying the peritoneal cavity; this may facilitate the use of BIS in this particular group of patients.

Indexed as

Dielectric SpectroscopyExtracellular FluidIntracellular FluidBody CompositionDialysis SolutionsHumansLinear ModelsPeritoneal DialysisDialysis Solutions

Identifiers

PMID22710970
OpenAlexW2058535291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.