Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22710441›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2012

You are what you eat: influence of type and amount of food consumed on central dopamine systems and the behavioral effects of direct- and indirect-acting dopamine receptor agonists.

Michelle G Baladi, Lynette C Daws, Charles P France

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dietary influences on cognition.Physiology & behavior · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pathological Overeating: Emerging Evidence for a Compulsivity Construct.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Individual Differences in Cue-Induced Motivation and Striatal Systems in Rats Susceptible to Diet-Induced Obesity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle G BaladiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Lynette C Daws
Charles P France
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Stimulant AbuseR01DA014684 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWS, LYNETTE C, GALLI, AURELIO · 2001 to 2010
$2.4M
Behavioral Pharmacology of Drug DependenceK05DA017918 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FRANCE, CHARLES P · 2005 to 2014
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA017918NIDA NIH HHS K05DA17918NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014684NIDA NIH HHS R01DA14684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The important role of dopamine (DA) in mediating feeding behavior and the positive reinforcing effects of some drugs is well recognized. Less widely studied is how feeding conditions might impact the sensitivity of drugs acting on DA systems. Food restriction, for example, has often been the focus of aging and longevity studies; however, other studies have demonstrated that mild food restriction markedly increases sensitivity to direct- and indirect-acting DA receptor agonists. Moreover, it is becoming clear that not only the amount of food, but the type of food, is an important factor in modifying the effects of drugs. Given the increased consumption of high fat and sugary foods, studies are exploring how consumption of highly palatable food impacts DA neurochemistry and the effects of drugs acting on these systems. For example, eating high fat chow increases sensitivity to some behavioral effects of direct- as well as indirect-acting DA receptor agonists. A compelling mechanistic possibility is that central DA pathways that mediate the effects of some drugs are regulated by one or more of the endocrine hormones (e.g. insulin) that undergo marked changes during food restriction or after consuming high fat or sugary foods. Although traditionally recognized as an important signaling molecule in regulating energy homeostasis, insulin can also regulate DA neurochemistry. Because direct- and indirect-acting DA receptor drugs are used therapeutically and some are abused, a better understanding of how food intake impacts response to these drugs would likely facilitate improved treatment of clinical disorders and provide information that would be relevant to the causes of vulnerability to abuse drugs. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Central Control of Food Intake'.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDopamineDopamine AgonistsEatingHumansDopamineDopamine Agonists

Identifiers

PMID22710441
PMCPMC3378985
OpenAlexW2095041106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.