ArticleJournal of translational medicine2012
Genomic characterization of explant tumorgraft models derived from fresh patient tumor tissue.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient-derived xenograft models of colorectal cancer in pre-clinical research: a systematic review.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Tumor slice cultures enable rapid ex vivo profiling of patient-specific drug sensitivity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Advancing cancer research: Cutting-edge insights from colorectal cancer patient-derived xenograft mouse models.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Current Advances in Preclinical Patient-Derived Cultivation Models for Individualized Drug Response Prediction in Pancreatic Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Polysaccharides and Structural Proteins as Components in Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Breast Cancer Tissue Models: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Patient-Derived Xenograft: A More Standard "Avatar" Model in Preclinical Studies of Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Patient-Derived Explants of Colorectal Cancer: Histopathological and Molecular Analysis of Long-Term Cultures.Cancers · 2021Article
- Review
- An association between successful engraftment of osteosarcoma patient-derived xenografts and clinicopathological findings.Histology and histopathology · 2020Article
- Patient-Derived Tumor Xenograft Models: Toward the Establishment of Precision Cancer Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
- Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models: characteristics and points to consider for the process of establishment.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2020Review
- Accelerating development of high-risk neuroblastoma patient-derived xenograft models for preclinical testing and personalised therapy.British journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Bone sarcoma patient-derived xenografts are faithful and stable preclinical models for molecular and therapeutic investigations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Patient-derived xenograft models in musculoskeletal malignancies.Journal of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Translational pancreatic cancer research: A comparative study on patient-derived xenograft models.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Nonlinear mixed effects dose response modeling in high throughput drug screens: application to melanoma cell line analysis.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Article
- The CA19-9 and Sialyl-TRA Antigens Define Separate Subpopulations of Pancreatic Cancer Cells.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Patient-derived xenografts for childhood solid tumors: a valuable tool to test new drugs and personalize treatments.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is resurgence within drug and biomarker development communities for the use of primary tumorgraft models as improved predictors of patient tumor response to novel therapeutic strategies. Despite perceived advantages over cell line derived xenograft models, there is limited data comparing the genotype and phenotype of tumorgrafts to the donor patient tumor, limiting the determination of molecular relevance of the tumorgraft model. This report directly compares the genomic characteristics of patient tumors and the derived tumorgraft models, including gene expression, and oncogenic mutation status.
methodsFresh tumor tissues from 182 cancer patients were implanted subcutaneously into immune-compromised mice for the development of primary patient tumorgraft models. Histological assessment was performed on both patient tumors and the resulting tumorgraft models. Somatic mutations in key oncogenes and gene expression levels of resulting tumorgrafts were compared to the matched patient tumors using the OncoCarta (Sequenom, San Diego, CA) and human gene microarray (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) platforms respectively. The genomic stability of the established tumorgrafts was assessed across serial in vivo generations in a representative subset of models. The genomes of patient tumors that formed tumorgrafts were compared to those that did not to identify the possible molecular basis to successful engraftment or rejection.
resultsFresh tumor tissues from 182 cancer patients were implanted into immune-compromised mice with forty-nine tumorgraft models that have been successfully established, exhibiting strong histological and genomic fidelity to the originating patient tumors. Comparison of the transcriptomes and oncogenic mutations between the tumorgrafts and the matched patient tumors were found to be stable across four tumorgraft generations. Not only did the various tumors retain the differentiation pattern, but supporting stromal elements were preserved. Those genes down-regulated specifically in tumorgrafts were enriched in biological pathways involved in host immune response, consistent with the immune deficiency status of the host. Patient tumors that successfully formed tumorgrafts were enriched for cell signaling, cell cycle, and cytoskeleton pathways and exhibited evidence of reduced immunogenicity.
conclusionsThe preservation of the patient's tumor genomic profile and tumor microenvironment supports the view that primary patient tumorgrafts provide a relevant model to support the translation of new therapeutic strategies and personalized medicine approaches in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.