Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22709392›Full record

ReviewThe Milbank quarterly2012

Moving from intersection to integration: public health law research and public health systems and services research.

Scott Burris, Glen P Mays, F Douglas Scutchfield, Jennifer K Ibrahim

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Milbank quarterly, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Trends in US State Public Health Emergency Laws, 2021-2022.American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Legal Epidemiology: The Science of Law.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2017
    Article
  12. A Scan of CDC-Authored Articles on Legal Epidemiology, 2011-2015.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2016
    Article
  13. Better Health Faster: The 5 Essential Public Health Law Services.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott BurrisNational Program Office, Public Health Law Research Program, Temple University, USA. scott.burris@temple.edu
Glen P Mays
F Douglas Scutchfield
Jennifer K Ibrahim
University of Kentucky · USTemple College · USTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFor three decades, experts have been stressing the importance of law to the effective operation of public health systems. Most recently, in a 2011 report, the Institute of Medicine recommended a review of state and local public health laws to ensure appropriate authority for public health agencies; adequate access to legal counsel for public health agencies; evaluations of the health effects and costs associated with legislation, regulations, and policies; and enhancement of research methods to assess the strength of evidence regarding the health effects of public policies. These recommendations, and the continued interest in law as a determinant of health system performance, speak to the need for integrating the emerging fields of Public Health Law Research (PHLR) and Public Health Systems and Services Research (PHSSR).

methodsExpert commentary.

findingsThis article sets out a unified framework for the two fields and a shared research agenda built around three broad inquiries: (1) the structural role of law in shaping the organization, powers, prerogatives, duties, and limitations of public health agencies and thereby their functioning and ultimately their impact on public health ("infrastructure"); (2) the mechanisms through which public health system characteristics influence the implementation of interventional public health laws ("implementation"); and (3) the individual and system characteristics that influence the ability of public health systems and their community partners to develop and secure enactment of legal initiatives to advance public health ("innovation"). Research to date has laid a foundation of evidence, but progress requires better and more accessible data, a new generation of researchers comfortable in both law and health research, and more rigorous methods.

conclusionsThe routine integration of law as a salient factor in broader PHSSR studies of public health system functioning and health outcomes will enhance the usefulness of research in supporting practice and the long-term improvement of system performance.

Indexed as

Empirical ResearchDelivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansPublic HealthSystems Integration

Identifiers

PMID22709392
PMCPMC3460210
OpenAlexW1854695020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.