ReviewThe Milbank quarterly2012
Health and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people's health?
Review in The Milbank quarterly, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
170 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- When People With Chronic Conditions Turn to Peers on Social Media to Obtain and Share Information: Systematic Review of the Implications for Relationships With Health Care Professionals.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Risks and Benefits of Web-Based Patient Narratives: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Mental Health Recovery Narratives and Their Impact on Recipients: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2019Pooled it
- Potential Benefits of Incorporating Peer-to-Peer Interactions Into Digital Interventions for Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- The Role of Seed Users in Nurturing an Online Health Community for Smoking Cessation Among People With HIV/AIDS.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024Trial
- A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020Trial
- An Innovative Electronic Health Toolkit (Our Whole Lives for Chronic Pain) to Reduce Chronic Pain in Patients With Health Disparities: Open Clinical Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Randomised feasibility study of a novel experience-based internet intervention to support self-management in chronic asthma.BMJ open · 2016Trial
- A novel experience-based internet intervention for smoking cessation: feasibility randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2016Trial
- Interactive sections of an Internet-based intervention increase empowerment of chronic back pain patients: randomized controlled trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Trial
- Patient narratives in an online hernia peer-support community: a qualitative netnographic analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Evolution of Discourse in the Reddit Hemorrhoid Community: Topic and Sentiment Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Patients' Real-World Experiences With Pharmacologic Therapies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A Mixed-Methods Analysis and Classification of Social Media and E-Forum Posts.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Effects of Death Anxiety Experienced by Individuals with Myocardial Infarction: A Phenomenological Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Between Visible Marks and Invisible Pain: A Qualitative Study of Multi-Layered Stigma Among Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "Numbers call for action, personalized narratives provide support and recognition": a qualitative assessment of cancer patients' perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) feedback with narratives.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Insights and Recommendations From Moderators and Community Members for Keeping Online Peer Support Safe: Thematic Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThe use of the Internet for peer-to-peer connection has been one of its most dramatic and transformational features. Yet this is a new field with no agreement on a theoretical and methodological basis. The scientific base underpinning this activity needs strengthening, especially given the explosion of web resources that feature experiences posted by patients themselves. This review informs a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) research program on the impact of online patients' accounts of their experiences with health and health care, which includes the development and validation of a new e-health impact questionnaire.
methodsWe drew on realist review methods to conduct a conceptual review of literature in the social and health sciences. We developed a matrix to summarize the results, which we then distilled from a wide and diverse reading of the literature. We continued reading until we reached data saturation and then further refined the results after testing them with expert colleagues and a public user panel.
findingsWe identified seven domains through which online patients' experiences could affect health. Each has the potential for positive and negative impacts. Five of the identified domains (finding information, feeling supported, maintaining relationships with others, affecting behavior, and experiencing health services) are relatively well rehearsed, while two (learning to tell the story and visualizing disease) are less acknowledged but important features of online resources.
conclusionsThe value of first-person accounts, the appeal and memorability of stories, and the need to make contact with peers all strongly suggest that reading and hearing others' accounts of their own experiences of health and illnesss will remain a key feature of e-health. The act of participating in the creation of health information (e.g., through blogging and contributing to social networking on health topics) also influences patients' experiences and has implications for our understanding of their role in their own health care management and information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.