Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22707980›Full record

ArticleExpert review of obstetrics & gynecology2012

Animal models of female pelvic organ prolapse: lessons learned.

Bruna M Couri, Andrew T Lenis, Ali Borazjani, Marie Fidela R Paraiso, Margot S Damaser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of obstetrics & gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. No birth-associated maternal mortality in Japanese macaques (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bruna M CouriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue ND20 Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Andrew T Lenis
Ali Borazjani
Marie Fidela R Paraiso
Margot S Damaser
Cleveland Clinic · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Stem Cell Homing for Treatment of Female Pelvic Floor DisordersR01HD059859 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI DAMASER, MARGOT S. · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse is a vaginal protrusion of female pelvic organs. It has high prevalence worldwide and represents a great burden to the economy. The pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse is multifactorial and includes genetic predisposition, aberrant connective tissue, obesity, advancing age, vaginal delivery and other risk factors. Owing to the long course prior to patients becoming symptomatic and ethical questions surrounding human studies, animal models are necessary and useful. These models can mimic different human characteristics - histological, anatomical or hormonal, but none present all of the characteristics at the same time. Major animal models include knockout mice, rats, sheep, rabbits and nonhuman primates. In this article we discuss different animal models and their utility for investigating the natural progression of pelvic organ prolapse pathophysiology and novel treatment approaches.

Identifiers

PMID22707980
PMCPMC3374602
OpenAlexW2068150959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.