ArticleJournal of comparative effectiveness research2012
Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement.
Article in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03098407 (A Pilot Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial of Buprenorphine vs. Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence in Pregnancy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 181 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial of Buprenorphine vs. Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence in Pregnancy.
Who cites it
181 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document.Trials · 2014Guideline
- Does engagement matter? The impact of patient and community engagement on implementation of cardiovascular health materials in primary care settings.BMC primary care · 2024Trial
- Partner engagement for planning and development of non-pharmacological care pathways in the AIM-Back trial.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Managing Obesity in Young Children: A Multiple Methods Study Assessing Feasibility, Acceptability, and Implementation of a Multicomponent, Family-Based Intervention.Childhood obesity (Print) · 2022Trial
- Increasing Readiness for Early Integrated Palliative Oncology Care: Development and Initial Evaluation of the EMPOWER 2 Intervention.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2021Trial
- Stakeholder-engaged process for refining the design of a clinical trial in home hospice.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- A randomized controlled trial comparing in-person and wiki-inspired nominal group techniques for engaging stakeholders in chronic kidney disease research prioritization.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Moving family interventions into the real world: What matters to oncology stakeholders?Journal of psychosocial oncologyTrial
- Patient Identification of the most important outcomes in a gastrointestinal behavioral health program.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.Evaluation & the health professions · 2026Review
- Perspectives from a multi-stakeholder workshop for implementing a risk-stratified breast cancer screening program in Canada.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Development of a Diabetes Rural Stakeholder Research Team and Patient-Centered Research Agenda.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2026Article
- Improving Collaborative Engagement in Health State Valuation: A Scoping Review of Current Practices and Emerging Recommendations.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- Stakeholder engagement as a valuable tool to improve the relevance of research regarding framework development.npj veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- On the compounding manifestations of racism shaping the US HIV/AIDS epidemic: why ending the HIV epidemic must address these factors for success.AIDS (London, England) · 2025Article
- Co-creating a Canadian autism mental health literacy resource: a qualitative analysis of advisory perspectives.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsStakeholder engagement is fundamental to comparative effectiveness research (CER), but lacks consistent terminology. This paper aims to define stakeholder engagement and present a conceptual model for involving stakeholders in CER. MATERIALS #ENTITYSTARTX00026;
methodsThe definitions and model were developed from a literature search, expert input and experience with the Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Cancer Genomics, a proof-of-concept platform for stakeholder involvement in priority setting and CER study design.
resultsDefinitions for stakeholder and stakeholder engagement reflect the target constituencies and their role in CER. The 'analytic-deliberative' conceptual model for stakeholder engagement illustrates the inputs, methods and outputs relevant to CER. The model differentiates methods at each stage of the project; depicts the relationship between components; and identifies outcome measures for evaluation of the process.
conclusionWhile the definitions and model require testing before being broadly adopted, they are an important foundational step and will be useful for investigators, funders and stakeholder groups interested in contributing to CER.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.